Skip to main content
Known Participant
September 22, 2016

P: Slow performance on Xeon CPUs

  • September 22, 2016
  • 234 replies
  • 9087 views

I noticed that LR clone and brush tool on my XEON E5-1650 0 3.20GHz (Attention: E5-1650 0 and not E5-1650 v4) can not stress my CPU and after x minutes of working LR slow down, until I have to restart it.

Please see the full diskussion with the problem here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2210245 (test with different Lightroom versions, confrontation with a weak laptop, that works fine, tests wit other graphic grafic card, test with other bios settings etc. No results. Only restart LR or minor display resolution helps.)

Can anyone with an XEON E5-1650 0 3.2Ghz confirm this?

This topic has been closed for replies.

234 replies

Inspiring
November 7, 2016
I have a 4k display with an 8 core i-7 with 24GB RAM and I am basically dead in the water - I have been editing the same wedding since last Wednesday (5 days so far - 1800 .nef's!)

I can not live like this!  I will have to go back to using the Photoshop Image processor if this does not change soon!
Inspiring
November 7, 2016
I started having slow performance issues around August of this year - 2016 - It was after an update was installed, but I do not recall what the version number was!
Participating Frequently
October 30, 2016
Actually the mobile 4790 - I read it is somewhat of a wash.

I'm on a 17" laptop, no dual displays, WIN 10 Anniversary edition and the latest update to LR 6. It's been creeping since the spring starting on the old machine which had been upgraded over and over. I thought the brand new build and hardware would change things.

One thing did help a little after reading this thread yesterday was turning off the GPU on my Invidia 1070 video card for Lightroom. I used the Invidia settings. It still lags a little when going from one photo to the next or pasting settings or adjustment brushing any amount at all, but not the four or five seconds it was taking.

In all, we shouldn't even be having this conversation. LR has an issue that we should not have to tweak away.
Todd Shaner
Legend
October 30, 2016
According to PassMark's benchmarks the i7-6700HQ (8,023) is a lower performance processor than your previous i7-4790 (9,995). Also moving caches to a separate SSD has very little affect on LR's performance. What exact version of LR are you using, what OS version, what is your monitor's resolution, and are you using dual-displays?
Participating Frequently
October 29, 2016
I upgraded my machine from an I7 4790 and 16gb of ram with a 1tb SSD drive to one with an I7 6700HQ 64gb RAM and two 1tb SSD drives - keeping the cache on a separate drive. I did this because I thought I had worn out the old machine because LR CC had started to run so slowly. It runs just as slowly on the new machine and it is becoming extremely frustrating.

When will Adobe address this issue?
Known Participant
October 27, 2016
I did some tests and can confirm this behaviour:
using a 6 (12) core i7 machine with a 4k display makes Lightroom nearly compleately non-usable!
reducing the used cores by the described command above and reducing the display resolution speeds LR up.
In my eyes it is absolutely inacceptable that the leading application for photography pros shows this behaviour. It's exactly this group of users who will use 4k displays and high performance PCs on which LR fails and slows down rapidly!
Inspiring
October 15, 2016
Same problem Dawid.. I have Macbook Pro I5 2.9Ghz SSD 512, Ram 8go.. 
Participating Frequently
October 10, 2016
i7 -3770k w Win10 here with 16 GB RAM, Sapphire 7850 @ 1920x1200; latest Lightroom 6.7 on fast SSD with plenty of free space. Same issues: over about 20 spot adjustments and brushes on a single photography LR starts lagging terribly.

Using a brush it takes up to 20/30 seconds just for the red overlay to display over the area I just brushed. Same for additional spot tool edits. LR basically becomes unusable.
Hw acceleration on or off does not make any significant difference.

Frankly speaking it is unacceptable for a professional photography software as LR is supposed to be.

Even more it seems there is no developer feedback on this matter.
Not exactly the type of support you'd expect.
Todd Shaner
Legend
October 9, 2016
The above link references performance issues with a Xeon 6-core system that only started after updating from LR 6.6.1 to 6.7. Rolling back to 6.6.1 resolved the issues for this user.
robv69577667
Participating Frequently
October 9, 2016