P: Generated images violate user guidelines

the generated images were removed because they violate the user guidelines  when i use generitive fii in photoshop beta.the images are of ladies playing football

I keep getting an error message saying:

I'm just trying to fill a spot on a pretty basic photo. 

this feels like a bug that i hope gets fixed soon. 

Thanks! 

meghan

I watched a video demo with Aaron Nace who created some amazing fills with Generative fill. I can't get anywhere near that level of result? It even suggested my attempt was illegal assuming it was some kind of adult content. Very odd.

Photo of a group of people playing soccer (fully clothed!). One of the fingers looks warped from AI gen. I select the finger with the lasso tool, press Generative Fill, and then receive a warning that the Generative Images were removed because they violate user guidelines.

I think your moderation bot needs a lesson on hands and fingers.

It also doesn't like male biceps - man fully clothed (track pants, tank top) but bicep was cropped on the side of the image. Tried Generative Fill and received the same error, violation of user guidelines. 

I tried to remove a tash from a picture of my brother. I got a warning saying it was against the rules ? Why ?

As someone who plays a lot in Stable Diffusion, Mid-Journey and other AI platforms, Adobe's is excessively restrictive. For instance I tried to take a picture of a friend, generate a beach and girls in bikini's behind him. That was a "violation of policy" according to the application. Then I tried to create a environment of him standing next to dog poop, again that was a "violation of policy". None of the other platforms I deal with are this restricted. I believe Adobe is going to have a hard time with this level of restrictions.

Hi,

I have been working with (or lack their of) the new the generative fill features in Photoshop 24.6.0. However, the feature is mostly unusable do to persistent user guideline violation warnings. This has occurred when I use generative fill on backgrounds, facial blemishes, hair, grass, etc. I am primarily using it to evaluate how well it works during photo restorations, but it's largely unusuable. The current file I'm working with is a portrait of three people which I own the rights to. I have successfully restored this image in every other AI assisted application without any issues. 

I have reviewed the user guidelines and I don't see how I could possibly be violating any terms. Is this a known issue? Is there any method to avoid this?

Thank you,
   Jesse