Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

Participating Frequently
September 18, 2023
Kevin,
I have personal experience of spending ages stating "girl" and getting women along with violation errors when trying it. I've had multiple violation errors with "bikini" to the point where I gave up. I could add whelk, weed, grass, clam, rock and God knows how many other words that have generated violation errors too.

My entire post was based on MY experience. I asked for a night sky and got half a woman's head!. Please don't tell me I'm talking rubbish, even unintentionally. It's far from professional to tell a beta tester, giving honest feedback, that they are talking crap.

I genuinely want to know whether I'm going to be charged credits every time Photoshop gets it wrong like this .
Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

@MontyWales You'll need to brush up on what is available and what isn't. Tardis and Doctor Who are copyritghted entities and would not be available in Gen Fill or Firefly. Try entering "police call box" or "british phone booth"

 

Known Participant
September 18, 2023

I assume you mean the anecdotal evidence that some people (3Hounds, for example) have been able to modify pictures with nudity, but I'm not sure we've proven that their success isn't yet another bug.  Clearly this problem exists outside of modifying nude pictures and I have seen the error when doing completely innocuous editing, but the fact that the feature exists to disallow some image editing is not in doubt.  The only question is which of us are going to be inconvenienced by Adobe pre-deciding what is appropriate and what is not.  

Known Participant
September 18, 2023

Haaa so I asked for The tardis from Dr Who. I got this 🙂 LOL And they think I should pay for this 

 

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

HI @David30122720qek7 the thread you are replying to "Paying for every use with their credits scheme only to be told a bikini is immoral, or a girl has to be a woman, or similar" is not true at all.

Participating Frequently
September 18, 2023
Kevin,
Sorry, what thread?. I'm not seeing any links other than to my profile and the entire bugs forum. I'm not even sure what it is that's a myth?
David
Heiko Kanzler
Participant
September 18, 2023

@3Hounds Still struggeling with this. I do mostly boudior I would love to use the Generative Expand. Cropping / cutting is one thing, but then pasting in mostly doesn't work as the proportions have changed. How can prompting help?

Known Participant
September 18, 2023

Agree 110%. A little careful prompting and mask creating will get you what you need or want. I have put lingerie on nude models without rejected gens.

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

@David30122720qek7 please read this thread before commenting - this has been disproven as a myth time and time again.

Participating Frequently
September 18, 2023
Agree 100 percent. Paying for every use with their credits scheme only to be told a bikini is immoral, or a girl has to be a woman, or similar is going to drive pro photographers and artists insane..and to other platforms.
If I'm working on promo shots for an hotel, and they want ,dare I say it, females, on the beach, is PS going to still throw an error at me every damn time?