Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

Gaetan 33
Participating Frequently
August 21, 2023

Avec plaisir. Merci à Unmesh Dinda de la chaine youtube PiXimperfect 😉

Participant
August 21, 2023

9/10 times I try to use the generative AI feature, it gives me the orange user guidelines violation popup.

I am using the generative ai on midjourney generated images that are nowhere near nsfw, or anything like that. It's just images of furniture, architecture, etc...

Participant
August 21, 2023

Also, I'm pretty much only using blank prompts.

YannM-001
Participating Frequently
August 21, 2023

@Gaetan 33Excellent !! merci beaucoup je viens de tester et l'astuce du point fonctionne à merveille. Merciiiii

Gaetan 33
Participating Frequently
August 21, 2023

ll suffit de mettre un point dans le prompt et le message disparait.

YannM-001
Participating Frequently
August 21, 2023

@Ludz899sur une photo classique, ca fonctionne chez moi .. c'est moins top qu'avant je trouve les propositions mais je ne mets aucun prompt et je n'ai pas de personnages ou de voitures .. (dieu merci et désolé pour toi .. a ne rien comprendre la)
Exemple ici j'ai aggrandit a droite et en haut de l'image (oui on s'en doute)

YannM-001
Participating Frequently
August 21, 2023

@Ludz899 
Alors si je rajoute sur les cotés je suis obligé de mettre un Prompt ; "delete" sinon il me fait son message d'erreur "Les images generées ont été supprimés car elles enfreignent les consignes d'utilisations" (on se demande pourquoi chaque fois !!)
Photo en studio (exemple ci joint)

Participating Frequently
August 20, 2023

This app looks very cool, does it need the virtualization to working on a basic computer ?

Participating Frequently
August 20, 2023

If Adobe intended that as a policy, they could easily say so, but they haven't. Both words AND deeds show what a person (or a company) really is. Adobe, please clarify your policy for post-beta!

Participating Frequently
August 20, 2023
Yes, but Adobe is, well, Adobe. Much bigger, more incoming funds, more
support staff, more expensive, ie, more expectations from the public. You
wouldn’t expect the same things from a Lexus as you would a rolls Royce.
That “button” should already exist.
In the last couple of days, I’ve been advised to update PS beta to get the
program working in sync with LRC, then advised to go back to the previous
version when there were new issues that came up, then back to previous
issues that were worse than the first time, and then back to the upgrade,
still with issues but at least workable if not efficient. I get hiccups,
but leave a workaround that works until a corrective update comes along.
Lately, it’s been very bad.
--
Arnel Gonce
RLeintzPhotos
Participating Frequently
August 20, 2023

I think the biggest problem right now is we don't know what's a bug and what is actually a violation. For example, if I have a field of flowers with a path on it and select it, gen fill with no prompt, and it gives me a user violation, ok, got it, it's a bug. But if I select skin that's close to the top of a breast line and ask it to remove wrinkles and I get a violation error?... What? Is the Ai tool just bugging out again or is this some kind of morality filter? I'm hoping we'll get more clarity when it gets out of Beta. Then at least we can know what we're debating 🙂