Skip to main content
H
Hematita
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

    1084 replies

    Show previous replies
    Gaetan 33
    Gaetan 33
    Participating Frequently
    August 21, 2023

    ll suffit de mettre un point dans le prompt et le message disparait.

      YannM-001
      YannM-001
      Participating Frequently
      August 21, 2023

      @Ludz899sur une photo classique, ca fonctionne chez moi .. c'est moins top qu'avant je trouve les propositions mais je ne mets aucun prompt et je n'ai pas de personnages ou de voitures .. (dieu merci et désolé pour toi .. a ne rien comprendre la)
      Exemple ici j'ai aggrandit a droite et en haut de l'image (oui on s'en doute)

        YannM-001
        YannM-001
        Participating Frequently
        August 21, 2023

        @Ludz899 
        Alors si je rajoute sur les cotés je suis obligé de mettre un Prompt ; "delete" sinon il me fait son message d'erreur "Les images generées ont été supprimés car elles enfreignent les consignes d'utilisations" (on se demande pourquoi chaque fois !!)
        Photo en studio (exemple ci joint)

          R
          Randalph
          Participating Frequently
          August 20, 2023

          This app looks very cool, does it need the virtualization to working on a basic computer ?

            S
            Sarah27914909k9u3
            Participating Frequently
            August 20, 2023

            If Adobe intended that as a policy, they could easily say so, but they haven't. Both words AND deeds show what a person (or a company) really is. Adobe, please clarify your policy for post-beta!

              A
              ArnelGonce
              Participating Frequently
              August 20, 2023
              Yes, but Adobe is, well, Adobe. Much bigger, more incoming funds, more
              support staff, more expensive, ie, more expectations from the public. You
              wouldn’t expect the same things from a Lexus as you would a rolls Royce.
              That “button” should already exist.
              In the last couple of days, I’ve been advised to update PS beta to get the
              program working in sync with LRC, then advised to go back to the previous
              version when there were new issues that came up, then back to previous
              issues that were worse than the first time, and then back to the upgrade,
              still with issues but at least workable if not efficient. I get hiccups,
              but leave a workaround that works until a corrective update comes along.
              Lately, it’s been very bad.
              --
              Arnel Gonce
                RLeintzPhotos
                RLeintzPhotos
                Participating Frequently
                August 20, 2023

                I think the biggest problem right now is we don't know what's a bug and what is actually a violation. For example, if I have a field of flowers with a path on it and select it, gen fill with no prompt, and it gives me a user violation, ok, got it, it's a bug. But if I select skin that's close to the top of a breast line and ask it to remove wrinkles and I get a violation error?... What? Is the Ai tool just bugging out again or is this some kind of morality filter? I'm hoping we'll get more clarity when it gets out of Beta. Then at least we can know what we're debating 🙂 

                  G
                  GRPImagery
                  Known Participant
                  August 20, 2023

                  its a bit of a joke what gets flagged IMO.   Fairly random with no way of notifying/repealing.   Makes the funtion randomly useless.

                    daniellei4510
                    Community Expert
                    daniellei4510Community Expert
                    Community Expert
                    August 20, 2023

                    Truce. Because this is like arguing politics with someone in a bar. Unless we decide to run for office or get hired by Adobe as a programmer, there isn't much we can do to change what is. 🙂

                    Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
                      J
                      J-D-F
                      Known Participant
                      August 20, 2023

                      Chair arms and skin are two cherry-picked scenarios. In the world of photography there is a massive breadth of content that includes people in various states of dress, situations and poses. Choose some scenarios like how short can shorts be or can you show a diamond necklace above a plunging neckline? Adobe has become the principal of a grammar school, and reasonable is in their hands. "The other Ai companies are doing it." Is not an argument. It's an excuse. 

                        Show more replies
                        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
                        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices