Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

Known Participant
August 20, 2023

its a bit of a joke what gets flagged IMO.   Fairly random with no way of notifying/repealing.   Makes the funtion randomly useless.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 20, 2023

Truce. Because this is like arguing politics with someone in a bar. Unless we decide to run for office or get hired by Adobe as a programmer, there isn't much we can do to change what is. 🙂

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Known Participant
August 20, 2023

Chair arms and skin are two cherry-picked scenarios. In the world of photography there is a massive breadth of content that includes people in various states of dress, situations and poses. Choose some scenarios like how short can shorts be or can you show a diamond necklace above a plunging neckline? Adobe has become the principal of a grammar school, and reasonable is in their hands. "The other Ai companies are doing it." Is not an argument. It's an excuse. 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 19, 2023

"It seems understandable" in the sense that every legitimate AI program today has restrictions and banned words. In any case, if editing the arm of a couch results in a guidelines violation, and editing skin does the same, there's no way to know if the message has something to do with censorship. Will we ever be able to generate a nude from scratch using generative fill? Nope. Never. There are other avenues for that. Will we be able to edit skin or the arm of a couch in the future? Yes. In time.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Inspiring
August 19, 2023

Consider using the 'remove tool' for removing trash cans. 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 19, 2023

Did you enter a "." for a prompt? This often fixes the issue.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participant
August 19, 2023

I will literally select an area of walking path, enter no prompt, and it'll tell me it violates guidelines.  Been trying to remove a trash can from a picture for like 1 hr =(

Known Participant
August 19, 2023

"it seems understandable" is as subjective as how and what to include in an overly-zealous censorship engine. "What" is understandable? Without answering the "what" it's all a matter of personal preference. Adobe isn't breaking any new ground here except with their legal wrangling.

Participant
August 19, 2023

AI is saying I'm violating user guidelines due to nudity

V 25.0

MacOS 12.6.8

 

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 21, 2023

What type of prompts are you entering when using AI? If you are leaving it blank it could be a false flag error. Add a period "." and try again.

Participating Frequently
August 19, 2023

It's been awhile since I posted on this violate guidlines error. Strange my orginal post has morphed in with everyone else problem. In general I see many are just as annoyed as I was over the idea being censored. I have been keeping up with the latest updates and overall when I ask the genernative fill to remove a object or fill in a empty space on my canvas it does a pretty good job 80% of the time. I really haven't had the time to sit down and push it's limits till last week.  I'm wrapping up this project without PS Beta, but I wanted to see how OR if it the AI bot would violate what I suspected would be a problem. One of my accounts makes high end wood and metal old model ships, WWI model aircraft, and artillary from the US civil war. The project invloved creating a print ad for a model of the 1850's Napolean Cannon that was used in the US civil war. I have uploaded the art without any of the overlying ad copy that would hide roughly 30% of the art. What I wanted Generative fill to do was add a war torn rebal flag in opposition to the Union flag flying over the canon in the background. Surprise, surprise, that request was violated. So I tried saying add a Confederate flag and that too was violated. So basically it's really cut and dry that I am going to be forced to use none Adobe software for some of my professional work on this account. This is just a prime example of what I was concerned about, of corprate nanny culture interfering with professionals like myself in doing their job. Like it or not history around the world wasn't pretty. Context for images created are very important, as was in this case the intent of this ad was to be educational and thought provoking. Most people including myself had no clue a French cannon was used on both sides of this important peice of US history.  In the end the confederate flag would mostly been hidden with text anyway. This censorship issue remains to be a problem.