P: Generated images violate user guidelines

I tried to remove a handicap sign and I got the violate message.

@CShubert @Pete.Green I'm a boudoir photographer, so yeah, the images that I work on are semi-naked women. Is that why I'm getting the flag? I'm making a section of skin (usually just the skin and no other body parts) and typing in "remove wrinkles and marbling" it was working fine for about 2 days, now I seem to get the violation everytime. If I close PS beta and open it again, it will still give me the error but generate one variation. 

i decided to look at the option of re-installing Lr and/or Ps Beta since the update of Ps Beta caused all these glitches. 

*i also noticed that Lr's external editor default was set  to Ps 2024 with no option to select Ps Beta.

i opened Adobe CC and saw that neither Adobe Ps nor Ps Beta was listed under the installed apps.

i installed Ps 24.7.0 and everything is now working fine (sending files to/fro Lr) and i now have (at least) the use of the Ai Remove tool.  

i am looking forward to using the generative fill tool sometime soon.

I keep getting a guideline violation over and over when trying to work on skin retouching? Is this a real violation or a bug? 

The generated imeges were removed because they violate user guidelines.
I cant use the ia of photoshop, i work with artistic nudity and it gives me error when i just want to generate a background, I dont know what else to do.

Also worth noting. the placement of the trashcan on each generative thumbnail is poor. I have already accidently deleted many renderings. Thank goodness for crtl or command Z.

I have to say that beta version 25.0 is a complete mistep in terms of functionality and versatility, so much so that I resorted to using version 24.7 which I believe was the best iteratio . Unfortunately as of today August 14, 2023 generative fill can longer be used with version 24.7. This crusade to arbitrate the moral landscape in creation has become too authoritarian in my honest opinion.

I know the guidelines, and I think it would be a good idea to have nudity filter as a preference instead of a violation to the guidelines for the final product.

I know a lot of us work with nudity and it's extremely annoying that we are getting an insane amount of guidelines violation messages when working on those pictures, even if we want to only change things on the background or props in the scene.

I also find amazing to be able to change models outfits, but there are a lot of times we work with transparent clothes (nudity again) and when trying to generate more options it will always throw a violation message, or if it works the transparent parts will be deleted, which is not really helpful.

I think that this software is directed to adults doing professional work and not kids wanting to generate perverted things. While I understand that problematic, I think that the focus should be mainly on the professional side.

So, having nudity as a preference would allow professionals to activate it and have better results and thus a better experience while working, and those who don't need it can keep it deactivated so they don't get any explicit result when working.

For photographers in the field of portrait and nude photography, the new program is no longer usable, as the guidelines restrict too much. The idea is good, but you can't make art in the areas mentioned anymore!! As a photographer, I depend on working with bare skin.

Sincerely, Steffen Schiller