Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

Participating Frequently
August 14, 2023

I have to say that beta version 25.0 is a complete mistep in terms of functionality and versatility, so much so that I resorted to using version 24.7 which I believe was the best iteratio . Unfortunately as of today August 14, 2023 generative fill can longer be used with version 24.7. This crusade to arbitrate the moral landscape in creation has become too authoritarian in my honest opinion.

Participant
August 14, 2023

I know the guidelines, and I think it would be a good idea to have nudity filter as a preference instead of a violation to the guidelines for the final product.

 

I know a lot of us work with nudity and it's extremely annoying that we are getting an insane amount of guidelines violation messages when working on those pictures, even if we want to only change things on the background or props in the scene.

 

I also find amazing to be able to change models outfits, but there are a lot of times we work with transparent clothes (nudity again) and when trying to generate more options it will always throw a violation message, or if it works the transparent parts will be deleted, which is not really helpful.

I think that this software is directed to adults doing professional work and not kids wanting to generate perverted things. While I understand that problematic, I think that the focus should be mainly on the professional side.

 

So, having nudity as a preference would allow professionals to activate it and have better results and thus a better experience while working, and those who don't need it can keep it deactivated so they don't get any explicit result when working.

Participant
August 15, 2023

Things are a bit prudish, Adobe! I agree with the above!

Participant
August 14, 2023

For photographers in the field of portrait and nude photography, the new program is no longer usable, as the guidelines restrict too much. The idea is good, but you can't make art in the areas mentioned anymore!! As a photographer, I depend on working with bare skin.

Sincerely, Steffen Schiller

Caity.psd
Community Manager
Community Manager
September 6, 2023

Hi @PictureArt31659097 I hear you and am looking into our plans in this area.

 

Always curious to hear thoughts on how we might allow this without causing harm in other areas (if you have any thoughts there please share!). 

 

I am merging your post to our main conversation thread on this. Thank you!

Participant
August 14, 2023

I have been using Photoshop Beta for the last few days with no problems but today I was editing a photo of a wedding. The Bride and her mother was in her bedroom as there was good light from the window however a part of the bed was in the photo and I tried to remove it with the generative fill and it gives me a message saying I am in violation of guidelines. I don't understand. there is no nudity or terrorism or violance..Just a bride and her mother and the part of a bed, which I want to remove.

 

J.C. Scott
Inspiring
August 13, 2023

You know, it would be great if I could use Generative AI, but in the last few days, it's become almost unusable for my needs. Attempting to fix anything attached to an individual results in a violation notice most of the time. For God's sake, Adobe, do something about this. I realize it's a beta, but this issue is getting worse.

OS: Windows 10

PS Beta: Current version

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 13, 2023

It would be helpful if you could show us what you are trying to accomplish. Generative Fill is not and will never be the be all and end all of editing in Photosho, even when it is out of beta. I've seen so many instances where edits could have been accomplished with tools that have been available in Photoshop for years as well as more recently. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
J.C. Scott
Inspiring
August 13, 2023
quote

It would be helpful if you could show us what you are trying to accomplish. Generative Fill is not and will never be the be all and end all of editing in Photosho, even when it is out of beta. I've seen so many instances where edits could have been accomplished with tools that have been available in Photoshop for years as well as more recently. 


By @daniellei4510

 

This is one of many examples. I generate AI art, and my use case is often defect removal. For this particular example, I could use something like Content Aware Fill or simply fill it in manually, but the former doesn't do the job as well as it could, which leaves some cleanup, and the latter would take a lot longer than using Generative AI.

 

Another example:

 

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
August 12, 2023

I've had heaps of NSFW images generated. Adobe needs to look at their own stock first

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 12, 2023

I know this does nothing to fix what appears to be a bug, but may I suggest going the old-fashioned way? I selected the horse's nose, copied it, pasted it, turned it black, and gave it a little blur.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
hectorgomezcreative
Known Participant
August 12, 2023

I get this error in most of the generative fills with people/models.... I think Adobe is trying to protect themselves from creating NSFW images but it's taking it to absurd extremes...

Participant
August 12, 2023

Prompt "remove person" might help you here. 

Participant
August 12, 2023

See attached image. Just want to clear the arm so the shadow of the horse is complete. So no violate guidline was violated. Got this alot. Also when I am just working on a horse to get rid of some line.

 

Not (yet) good Adobe.