Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

It's a beata. If you go to stock.adobe.com and enter a search for boudoir, or whatever, I'll believe you'll discover that Adobe has no interest in banning such subject matter. Things will improve.

[abuse removed by moderator]

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

For me, it is a fantasy pic, slightly NFSW (no p*rn or whatsoever edit: even the p. word is banned, i'm sick of this society), but I did not ask Photoshop to generate it or anything "against the rules" (God, I feel like a kid took the hand in the pot of jam), only to crop the file to 16/9 with a transparent background on each side and the bot refuses to let me do it. It does not make sense. Ok, they don't want to let us generate NSFW (feminine only) content. It's creepy, sexist and misogynist, but ok, FINE. The Middle Ages will disappear one day, but [cursing removed] ? I use the file I want, I modify it as I want, and not according to what their stupid policy decides to let me do or not. I am no longer a child, and my father has died for a long time, I don't need another

Known Participant
July 30, 2023

Randalph I don't understand what you mean by "now they ban the image directly on your computer..."

I just worked on an image of an unclothed from the waist up model, using her arms to cover up. A couple of fingers looked wierd on one hand, so I generated several iterations and got one that worked. I didn't even get 1 version with the usual 7 fingers...

No violation of terms dialog either.

 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

So...two months? Adobe's Neural Filter Background Blur has been in beta since around July of 2021. Beta testing can take a very time.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 30, 2023

I've been working on this test since it came out in MAY ! Havn't seen the slightest improvement

Inspiring
July 30, 2023

I really don't understand the anger. This is a beta. It's experimental. We are guests and tester. They are working on it. 

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 30, 2023

Problem is that it's way beyond a joke now 

Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

It's getting worse everyday, now they ban the image directly on your computer... We live in the movie 1984, guys. Here we are. You cannot even resize if this stupid bot doesn't like your picture...ADOBE IS THIS A JOKE ?

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

Very few AI programs can do hands and feet properly. There is at least one exception but even it can delivrer a six or seventh finger now and then. You'll be extremely lucky if you get a result that works or that at least doesn't require some additional hands-on editing (no pun intended). 

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 30, 2023

Tried 7 regenerations and I CANNOT get a decent hand on this woman the other one's pretty poor as well.