Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1085 replies

Known Participant
August 1, 2023

You're closing your account over an issue with software that's not released yet?

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 1, 2023

In your life? 🙂 OK, bye.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

But you aren't renting anything. You are taking advantage of Adobe's Firefly (firefly.adobe.com) which is presently in beta and available for free to the public, whether they have an Adobe account or not.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

Still my computer, my file, a server is a tool, a machine. A machine that I rent. What's the next step ? Spying my phone because it's their servers ? My bank account because it's their servers ?

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

Actually, they do, since the AI is being generated on THEIR servers, not your computer. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

to have access to a beta you need a subscription, it's not free...and btw, free or not, beta or not, they don't have any right to restrict the use or what file i'm using on my computer

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

Exactly, since what they are paying for is the WORKING version of Photoshop, not the public beta. It's always there to fall back on if one's frustration level becomes unbearable. 🙂

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participant
July 30, 2023

My record with SDXL is eleven fingers on one "realistic" hand so far! Not quite entirely there yet 🙂

 

And yes, this is a beta feature. Getting pissed off and threatening "I won't pay for this!" when it's a BETA is a bit futile. Having said that, I would totally pay extra if it could fix the eleven-fingered hands… 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

It's a beata. If you go to stock.adobe.com and enter a search for boudoir, or whatever, I'll believe you'll discover that Adobe has no interest in banning such subject matter. Things will improve.

[abuse removed by moderator]

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

For me, it is a fantasy pic, slightly NFSW (no p*rn or whatsoever edit: even the p. word is banned, i'm sick of this society), but I did not ask Photoshop to generate it or anything "against the rules" (God, I feel like a kid took the hand in the pot of jam), only to crop the file to 16/9 with a transparent background on each side and the bot refuses to let me do it. It does not make sense. Ok, they don't want to let us generate NSFW (feminine only) content. It's creepy, sexist and misogynist, but ok, FINE. The Middle Ages will disappear one day, but [cursing removed] ? I use the file I want, I modify it as I want, and not according to what their stupid policy decides to let me do or not. I am no longer a child, and my father has died for a long time, I don't need another