Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

August 1, 2023

The false guideline violation errors are getting worse with every new beta release. The big trigger seems to be having a woman anywhere in the photo. Photoshop rarely complains about men, and will hapilly generative fill most images where only a man is present. But the presence of the most modestly-clad woman, covered from toe to neck, will cause an error. It's like just her face is enough. Putting a period in the prompt helps sometimes, but less so as the betas roll on.

It's also annoying that "grass" and "weeds" are censored. "Wildflowers" works, but will often just draw a single cartoon flower, not fill an area with grass.

Participant
August 1, 2023

sorry for tha late reply, thanks for correcting my prompt it's work like charm

Known Participant
August 1, 2023

You're closing your account over an issue with software that's not released yet?

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 1, 2023

In your life? 🙂 OK, bye.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

But you aren't renting anything. You are taking advantage of Adobe's Firefly (firefly.adobe.com) which is presently in beta and available for free to the public, whether they have an Adobe account or not.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

Still my computer, my file, a server is a tool, a machine. A machine that I rent. What's the next step ? Spying my phone because it's their servers ? My bank account because it's their servers ?

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

Actually, they do, since the AI is being generated on THEIR servers, not your computer. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participating Frequently
July 30, 2023

to have access to a beta you need a subscription, it's not free...and btw, free or not, beta or not, they don't have any right to restrict the use or what file i'm using on my computer

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 30, 2023

Exactly, since what they are paying for is the WORKING version of Photoshop, not the public beta. It's always there to fall back on if one's frustration level becomes unbearable. 🙂

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participant
July 30, 2023

My record with SDXL is eleven fingers on one "realistic" hand so far! Not quite entirely there yet 🙂

 

And yes, this is a beta feature. Getting pissed off and threatening "I won't pay for this!" when it's a BETA is a bit futile. Having said that, I would totally pay extra if it could fix the eleven-fingered hands…