P: Generated images violate user guidelines

And now trying to expand a scene makes creepy monsters.  This would be funny if it wasn't wasting my time.   Can I get on a bulletin list that tells me when GF will stop butchering humans and doing weird things? 

Spoke too soon, now it is only generating hideously deformed White children instead of actually removing a person from the scene as I am telling it to do. 

Why does generative fill always make generated people Black? And why are they so hideously malformed?  Over and over I am trying to remove a white woman from a picture and rather than removing, it keeps replacing them with various Black people.   I've tried "remove person", "remove figure" all kinds of ways to tell the engine to take that person out of the picture, but it has other ideas.   Are we putting DEI poison in this thing? 

If you want a nice lawn style of grass try this prompt......Manicured Lawn with the (.) after lawn.    You'll often get it spot on

I hoped this would be fixed with the update, but clearly not. 

Agreed. Outside of criminal activity there should be 0 censorship for a tool that adults of sound mind are purchasing. Censorship based off subjective morality doesn't follow any linear logic therefore we're seeing its application affecting people haphazardly.

That being said, it still has issues but the blending has gotten a lot better compared to previous beta iterations. Using this software is like using magic. And all of this is still in its infancy so things are guaranteed to only get better for here. I just hope for the finished product they allow us to use photoshop as we've done so for decades - free of obtrusive censorship. People use this software for memes, people use it for business, people use it for leisure and everything in between. Let them use it how they want so long as it's not negatively impacting anyone.

Also if you have experience editing in photoshop when this program is working it feels like you can do anything. Especially since it's all in layers. 

So, essentially you need to pu t a period in the prompt and 99% of the time you get no "violation". I was able to work for hours using that method. As soon as I left it blank, 75% of everything was a violation again. 

This thread and beta has been an education on what NOT to do with technology imo. That being the censorship. Instead of being big brother and trying to mandate everything, let people have the freedom to decide for themselves what they do on their own computer. 

One issue I am annoyed with is the fact that the AI doesnt blend well into the image saturation or blending the background edges. You can see the lines where your selection was, you can select that area and make it blend a bit better, but still you need to go in and Heal Tool to fix it up. That needs top be improved. 

The false guideline violation errors are getting worse with every new beta release. The big trigger seems to be having a woman anywhere in the photo. Photoshop rarely complains about men, and will hapilly generative fill most images where only a man is present. But the presence of the most modestly-clad woman, covered from toe to neck, will cause an error. It's like just her face is enough. Putting a period in the prompt helps sometimes, but less so as the betas roll on.

It's also annoying that "grass" and "weeds" are censored. "Wildflowers" works, but will often just draw a single cartoon flower, not fill an area with grass.

sorry for tha late reply, thanks for correcting my prompt it's work like charm