Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

Participating Frequently
July 21, 2023

I wish I could clone myself just so I could feed my clone images to send to you about your broken Gen Fill Restrictive Guidlines. But alas, I only have so much time and you are already wasting enough of it.  This is too absurd to not send.  All night. long for my session, leaving gen fill blank results in 100% no render and your annoying restrictive guidlines window.  It doesn't work at all. It is absurd that a company your size let's this go on.   You are way below the standard for beta software.  This is an alpha problem. I wanted to add a 24k gold henna tattoo necklace on an elephant.  See below:

And guess what?  Voila!

Violation!!!!!  Please for the love of God tell me why this violates your guidlines?  Why?  I have fought this all night long guys.  There are really only two options here.  Either your engineers have made really bad code and your AI is not smart enough to run your guidlines parameters or you are doing this on purpose to be really really really really conservative.  Both answers are not good.   I beg you, please fix this. 

Participating Frequently
July 21, 2023

Hey @1950's Adobe.  So another day dealing with your 'Violating Your Guidlines policy.  So far this session you have wasted an hour of my time so I wanted to blast you again for what you are doing.  Oh, and another 40min wasted putting together this little message.  As previously mentioned, stop disrespecting and wasting professionals time with your half baked guidlines policy.  It has the AI intelligence of a rabbit.  Actually a rabbit could probably decern between objects better than your software.  90% of the time I leave the prompt blank it will not process and says I am violating your precious guidlines.  Then if I type somehting in it gives me a man in a work hat or something. Which I have to re-guess what words your rabbit brained software wants to hear in order to get me a good result.  It's maddening and it's waterboarding.  At this point I feel like the psychological torture of that process is a negligence on your part.  Here is what happens:

 

I select the side of an elephant to smooth it out, leave the prompt blank and.....

 

I am violating your guidlines.   [cursing removed]  I assume your rabbit brained AI thought it was a butt.  Really?  In any case, if that had worked,  I would move on.  But no.  So I had to figure out what to say.  Typing "complete elephant".  Gave me this:

Really?  What is that?  Why would it give me that?   That is so not even close.  That is why I am PO'd.  So now I have to spend the next 20 minutes trying to talk to a rabbit and get it to learn how to dance.  "Elephant body"gave me this:

 

Seriously?  I hope you find this amusing because it is.  It is laughable.  It took me many reselects, many phrase variations and finally I got it.  That is waterboarding.  It is torture.  Stop  doing this to your professional community.  I will say this again.  Take off all restrictions on this ASAP.  Create a new policy that puts the resposibility and liability on the user by making us verify our age.  I am so tired of telling you guys about this issue without anyone addressing it.  I have called the support number at least 10 times to complain and asked for an engineer to call back but no call.  I have sent countless examples to your @adobe with no response. I have sent 2 of these messages here without any response.  Shame on you.  Pretty please with sugar on top, take these restrictions off so I can work.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 20, 2023

This is also a case where Content Aware Fill would most likely work just as well, so why frustrate oneself with Generative Fill given its existing issues? Just a suggestion. 🙂

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 20, 2023

@Rafael3119322049zr also remember the Generative Fill is still in beta and cannot be used for commerical work, only personal.

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 20, 2023

@Rafael3119322049zr entering something in the prompt - in this case I used a period "." prevents false flag errors.

Participant
July 19, 2023

@Fabienne22264968m084 

Ich denke das liegt daran dass man nicht deutsch schreiben kann/darf.

Wenn du water statt wasser schreibst wirds wrsnl funktionieren.

Participant
July 19, 2023

Leider gibt mir die KI bei egal welchem Begriff den Hinweis, dass ein Richtlinienverstoß vorliegt. Ich habe es mit allen möglichen Begriffen auf weißer Grundlage getestet. Somit kann keine einzige Richtlinie (z.B. Begriff Wasser) verletzt werden.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

I got more or less the same when a friend asked me to do a similar pic. I never used weeds though

Inspiring
July 19, 2023

Out of curisoty I made a new selection and put in your prompt exactly as you stated (unmowed grass and "WEEDS" with wildflowers). I got this:

WelbornWorks
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

Some definitions need to be updated I think. When using genterative fill on rural country roadside photo scenes I want to put in unmowed grass and "WEEDS" with wildflowers. It doesn't like weeds. Which even it was thinking "weed" it could just give me the wild grasses we call weeds. If there were a list of usable words we could search or ANY sort of guidelines on text or language that would help and save a ton of time.