Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1084 replies

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 22, 2023

That's right. Some of us use Photoshop for a living.

 

I would never put beta software on my working machine, ever, in any form.

 

Beta software is for testing. That's what you're doing. Don't complain, provide feedback. That's your function here, as beta testers.

Participating Frequently
June 22, 2023

PS AI is at a primitive state compared to others. If it messes up on a drawing it gives you this message to save face. 

c.pfaffenbichler
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 22, 2023
quote

The Adobe creative community has over 30 million members, and I bet that every one of them gets the "user guidelines" warning several times a day. There are only two possible explanations for this: Either all 30+ million users of Photoshop are creeps, who use the program for dirty things, or Adobe must change the filter algorithm quickly.

Some Photoshop users work with Photoshop and don’t have time to play with Photoshop Beta all the time so they may never get that alert at all … 

Known Participant
June 22, 2023

The Adobe creative community has over 30 million members, and I bet that every one of them gets the "user guidelines" warning several times a day. There are only two possible explanations for this: Either all 30+ million users of Photoshop are creeps, who use the program for dirty things, or Adobe must change the filter algorithm quickly.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
June 22, 2023

Couldn't agree more. We're paying a HUGE sum of money to Adobe, not, to mention testing this for them. I totally grudge the fact that the violations  seem to be treating us like children. I've had a number of semi naked females show up in generations, so the fact that THEY can get away with this isn't fair in the slightest

Participant
June 22, 2023

I'm a professional wedding photographer and have been doing this for well over a decade now. The most common things that I do is remove blinking eyes by copying it from another photo and pointing someones foot more forward during a bride/groom dip.

Every time that I select the eyes and type (remove eyes) or foot (remove foot) I get a response that I violated the guidelines.

 

Now, I get that you don't want people to make somone look deformed, but I use this almost daily. This is my right as a paid user to use this however I would like. It is NOT the job of adobe to police what I can and cannot do with my photos. I feel like this is clearly not a good business decision on your part. 

I do not agree with you resticting the use of this prodect to manipulate an image with zero context on your end. 

 

Since when did adobe become so ridiculously liberal in it's actions? Please stop. I am not violating your meaningless terms. Your acting worse than internet fact checkers. 

Participant
June 22, 2023

Habe Photoshop Beta installiert. Allerdings egal welche Schlagwörter ich benutze bei der KI Foto-Erstellung, kommt sofort die Meldung das ich gegen die Richtlinien verstoße. Was muss ich tun, um normale KI Fotos erstellen zu können?

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 22, 2023

Can you share some examples of the image and prompts you are using?

SvetlanaDSF
Known Participant
June 22, 2023

I'm getting a repeated error that my AI generated images are being removed due to guidelines violation. The image I'm trying to generate is meant to fill the missing spot on a wall. There is nothing at all suspicious so please investigate this false positive case. Attached is a screenshot with the black blurb at the bottom being the area I'm trying to fill.

Participant
June 22, 2023

thisd works brilliantly

Inspiring
June 21, 2023

The biggest problem I have in generative fill is a repeating error message that generative images have been removed becaue they violate user guidlinges. This can happen  on any kind of image. Tring to extend the  image on an innocent photo of a person it also gets this error.  Photoshop Beta 24.7, Mac OS Ventura 13.4 

Trevor.Dennis
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 22, 2023

It's annoying, isn't it?  I had it happen when answering a forum question using the OP's image that they had already created with Generative Fill, so it had to have worked for him, but it blocked me with the exact same image!  Adobe are being super cautious, no doubt because of the bad press Ai has been getting.  I am not sure if the world is worried about being wiped out by Sky Net Terminators, or if the next POTUS being a computer.  It would be ironic if that happens to Adobe and a future Adobe MAX opens with a Crey Super Computer on stage!

Anyway, I am getting around the issue by copying the problem area — two ladies in swim suites in this case  — and bluring it enough to fool Gen Fill.  Then blending in the unblurred pixels from the original above the Gen Filled layer.