Participant

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
May 23, 2023
1087 replies
308002 views

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

Show previous replies

SvetlanaDSF

Known Participant

I'm getting a repeated error that my AI generated images are being removed due to guidelines violation. The image I'm trying to generate is meant to fill the missing spot on a wall. There is nothing at all suspicious so please investigate this false positive case. Attached is a screenshot with the black blurb at the bottom being the area I'm trying to fill.

D

defaultx3m0mue7jsip

Participant

thisd works brilliantly

G

Gregusaurus

Inspiring

The biggest problem I have in generative fill is a repeating error message that generative images have been removed becaue they violate user guidlinges. This can happen on any kind of image. Tring to extend the image on an innocent photo of a person it also gets this error. Photoshop Beta 24.7, Mac OS Ventura 13.4

Trevor.Dennis

Community Expert

It's annoying, isn't it? I had it happen when answering a forum question using the OP's image that they had already created with Generative Fill, so it had to have worked for him, but it blocked me with the exact same image! Adobe are being super cautious, no doubt because of the bad press Ai has been getting. I am not sure if the world is worried about being wiped out by Sky Net Terminators, or if the next POTUS being a computer. It would be ironic if that happens to Adobe and a future Adobe MAX opens with a Crey Super Computer on stage!

Anyway, I am getting around the issue by copying the problem area — two ladies in swim suites in this case — and bluring it enough to fool Gen Fill. Then blending in the unblurred pixels from the original above the Gen Filled layer.

Graham24508943nobd

Known Participant

I've been trying to generate a necklace but for the life of me the [cursing removed] thing is invisible every time.

Z

zevendesign18164115

Known Participant

Most designers and artists ARE against any kind of restrictions because we are adults. We are not more or less qualified than the other adults at Adobe at deciding what we want to create. What makes people at a software company in San Jose qualified to restrict what designers and artists can create? On the plus side, it opens the door to a lot of competition, which is always healthy. If Affinity Photo or Gimp implement a generative fill without restrictions, they will quickly take a lot of Adobe's marketshare. Just look at this thread. Hundreds of artists and designers being stopped from their daily work because Adobe decided they have the right to dictate what people who have paid for a product can do with it. And it's not lost on me that the petition posted here to end the restrictions was quickly removed by Adobe.

M

MontyWales

Known Participant

New update today

Graham24508943nobd

Known Participant

I prompted pose in the box and got a lady that had no top. Boobies clearly visable, BUT, horribly distorted.😅

Graham24508943nobd

Known Participant

Yep, it worked for me a coupl of times but it just doesn't create smoke lately at all.

R

robk76980083

Participant

CONSTANTLY getting the "generated images removed because they violate user guidelines" message for things that clearly do not come close to violating any guidelines. This definitely needs work.