P: Generated images violate user guidelines

I wondered that myself in the very beginning. Possibly because if a period were entered automatically, then users who normaly enter an actual prompt would have to remove it each time or enter their cursor in front of it. But just a guess. Meanwhile, keep in mind that a released version doesn't necessary mean that all bugs have been eliminated, but only that it is stable enough to be released into the wild. I'm sure your cell phone and numerous applications on your phone or computer require updating on a frequent bases to eliminate bugs or privacy issues discovered after the public release, sometimes even months later.

Yes, entering a "." period does fix the guideline error most of the time. What I do not understand is why isn't the period correction just put into the generative code by the engineers who are developing this AI program? Why is it left for us to continue to try to correct this bug? If the period works, why isn't it automatic and behind the scenes?

Have you attempted to enter a period (.) as your prompt? This fixes the issue 99% of the time. It's been well documented here. Nudity has nothing to do with it.

Having the same issue in photshop 25 (not beta).
Your tip says that if you want to remove something just don't write any prompt, when I try to remove a table (without any prompt) it says "the images were removed yada yada yada..." the image is of a woman fully clothed, nothing nsfw about it, in a publuc cafe and I am trying to remove a table behind her.
If this is your tip inside Photoshop, why here you suggest to add a prompt?

This is redicoulos, finally you make something amazing (after so many years you stagnated and practicly did nothing ionovotaive in photoshop) but than you add these stupid guidelines. WHY? are you afraid to be held acountable for some nudity or gore? it's not like I can't just use photshop the old fashioned way to make whatever I want, wouldn't you be accountable then?

What kind of an artist tool is that anyway? nudity has been part of the art world for thousdns of years, honsetly every day that go by I am fed up with your corporate BS more and more.

When you think a specific word is the issue, it's best to head over to Firefly and try a prompt there with the word in question. If you get a violation response, then it's the word. If not, it was a bug in GF.

I'm not giving prompts.  I want to continue what I started.  In this case a nude male and a sheet.  Like I said before, we're all adults and should have the creative rules to let generative fill do it's own thing.  The resulta can be surprising. 

@kawaki what specifically are you being restricted on? What kind of prompts are you using?

Also had no problems dressing nude women. However the silliest violation came up erlier today when I was working on a Christmas fairy for my wifes' christmas cards. For reasons known only to the bot and God, I'd 2 or 3 attempts blocked. There was no bare skin in view, so wonder would it have been the word fairy ?  I changed it to fairie after that and it was fine.

"I put swimsuit tops and bottoms on nude models quite often"

Yes, me too without issues.

V25 is no better. Your community guidelines are too constricting.  Artists are trying to create but are being met with this Adobe ideaology that harkens back to the 1900s.  Open up the boundries, we're all adults here.  Give us a more robust tool OR remove it.  Looking into other platforms that are not baby sitters.