P: Generated images violate user guidelines

British English, or that American version ?  🙂 

Autofill on the whole has been ok with me. Just wish the bot would learn English though

Again, auto fill can produce weird, bizard stuff. I posted 2 examples a couple of pages back. It has to see it is struggling and probably just pops this message up.

PS is not going to give you a message that says, "our beta is drawing some real crap based on your request and we are too embrassed to use it." No it will not say that, so YOU at fault. You violate community standards by giving us something we messed up on." 🙂

Hi,

i use the PS Beta 24.7.0 on Windows 10 and constantly get the error "The generated images were removed because they violate user guidelines." The images, however, do not violate the community guidelines. They are mostly photographs of a woman wearing a red sommer top and a summer skirt.

What can i do?

I do understand that this feature is still in beta, so im posting here with the intention to help identifiy mistakes.

did a beach scene yesterday. Result is ok. Still has MAJOR problems generating mountains, even hills and grass. Several times I asked for mountains and got either birds or objects that were not of this earth. Today I prompted for water in a small circle selection and got everything but

OK...at the risk of spamming the board, since I've already posted this once (although I can't find it and I was on my third glass of wine, so maybe it never got posted), this is a cropped image of a before and after AI image of a woman's chest that was edited entirely with Generative Fill. By making a second, small selection far removed from the main selection, Generative Fill did an excellent job without having to rely on the cloning tool, spot removal tool, remove tool, etc. The issue is a bug and there are work-arounds. Yes, there are words that Adobe has banned, and probably not purposefully. "Tank," for example, which, besides being a military vehicle, also has a variety of NSFW definitions on Urban Dictionary. Things will improve going forward.

Fitness photography - Bad

Sports photography - Bad

Beach photography - Especially Bad

What a miracle tool.  But the people who created this really went way overboard in trying to dictate terms of using photoshop for paying customers. I've never actually heard of a restriction of using photoshop prior to this tool. It's always been about free creativity based on the user's imagination. Now you can't even show a wrist or an ankle without getting flagged.  I know this is beta so I suppose perhaps for now this is just the place to be voicing certain opinions on the direction of this otherwise astonishing tool.

I hope when the official version comes out there's an option to identify us as adults. Adult paying customers should not be governered by puritanical guidelines of certain devs. Otherwise the technology will advance and you will just be directing it towards open source.

Furthermore you're marketing photoshop for photographers who have businesses but you're arbitrarily deciding which photography businesses are allowed to use it. There needs to be more thought behind the implications of these guidelines because ultimately people will fall in love with these features, be restricted from using them, and then go look for alternatives elsewhere.

😅😅😅.  

Any skilled Photoshop artist. Exactly. To sharpen my point: I'm willing to bet that all of world's skilled Photoshop artists combined produce a considerably lower number of seriously ill-intended deep fakes than the troll armies of the dark and grey areas of the interwebs, who would be able to do the same thing, only without any Photoshop skills at all, in literally 5 seconds.