P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Any skilled Photoshop artist can ALREADY accomplish any kind of fake image you can possibly imagine. How is the introduction of a new tool changing this in any significant way? 

[information removed as per forum guidelines]

https://community.adobe.com/t5/using-the-community-discussions/adobe-support-community-guidelines/td-p/4788157

Apologies to partake in the derailing of the bug report, but since it's already going there: content filtering isn't just about dodging legal consequences. Any big player in the AI field has a moral obligation to act responsibly with AI like Firefly. Just think about the sheer amount of deep fake we would live amongst if a company like Adobe would lift content filtering. Artistic freedom is one thing, and a priority to Adobe I'm sure, but another, massive thing is creators who don't give a rat's patoot about artistry, and have entirely different motives to use tools like this, that produce realistic imagery while require zero skills and creativity.

@alfred531 As stated many times in this thread, please try entering a basic prompt for now.

Was bitte soll bei diesem Bild gegen die Benutzerrichtlinien verstoßen?

WIN 11

PS Beta/24.7.0

I think a better solution, for both Adobe and artists, is to set up the generation to happen without saving anything to their servers. And then remove all restrictions and leave all legal liability on the users, where it belongs. This is the model that has existed for the last 30 years and has worked well. 

I agree. We're all ignoring the fact that Adobe have now established themselves as some kind of arbiter of virtue and purity with the "guidelines." Since when does the paintbrush dictate what art the painter can create? We've been conditioned to accept this as "normal" but it is so far from normal it actually defies belief. A design software company is dictating what artists can and can't design? In any other context, the solution would be to use a different tool. 

You already have to be over 18 to use it. No idea why though 🙂 

I have found a solution to the overzealous guidelines errors!  Generate your AI content using another piece of software or website, and then import it into Photoshop and work on it as normal.  In essence, don't waste your time trying to use Photoshop's generative fill, as it's completely broken and unusable.

I mostly work on editing photos of singers and musicians, from rock and metal bands.  Many of their outfits are quite revealing, with an abundance of torsos and cleavage on show.  the ONLY way I have had any success, is by chopping the source image up, so I can select just an arm to fix a missing elbow, or just a head to fix bad hair.  Any attempt to use a complete photo gets rejected.

I see 3 possible options for making GenFill work: 1, completely remove all restrictions (why are Adobe suddenly censoring our creations anyway?). 2, Fix the guidelines (this seems like an impossible option, without several more years of training for the AI). 3.  Just add an age requirement to the software, if you are over 18, there should be no restrictions to what you can create.

Hi folks, here's my latest creation.....Idyllic country scene. I prompted a calm river, and generated the house, garden, wildlife table, chairs etc....bit by bit, even the water drop. I find it a relaxing thing to do. I also create music for my own enjoyment so this is a nice change......