P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Cheers Bob, just needs a lot of tweaking and swearies 

Thanks! Graham. I see my problem. I expect too much. These are images that PS can take from stock and place them in a picture. I have also seen the puffin and desert fox examples, but the actual artwork was pain.

I imagined that fill gen could draw custom fills. Like if you told gen fill to fill in the bush below the cow with five plants with yellow and pink blooms.

Quess the solution to get exactly what I want is to have an image generator produce an image on a blank page, using detailed prompts, refine it and place it where I want it.

Another image I took4 years ago ( can't even remember the phone I had then ) This is the beach at the picturesque town of Rosemarkie 14 miles N of Inverness. There were several people on the right hand side of the beach near the water, and a couple of caravans on the left side. All removed perfectly. 

I took this pic using the iphone 14 pro max on raw setting last month. It's a country road high above Inverness Scotland. I added a highland cow, added a robin, pheasant, a blackbird, a buzzard overhead and a flock of geese. Excellent results this time

Gen fill - removing part of distorted swan head reflection violates user guidelines. And then it would not allow me to use Remove Tool...

I extended the lower portion of the image (the reflection) using gen fill and it did ok but distorted the swan's head - then I made a selection to remove the distorted portion with gen fill and gave me the violates user guidelines. Tried the Remove Tool but it did not allow me.

Sarah, Great to hear you are having success! Show us an example, please. Does not have to be the entire picture just enough to see what you have accomplished. I have gotten some very strange gen fills. Nothing usable yet. Been working on this everyday.

PS gen fill has become my hobby. 🙂 

Small GEN fill with an a larger image already works great. It's giving me fantastic results, when it works right. When it doesn't work right, it seems to be about thinking that the content is inappropriate, and that sometimes is just wrong.

Subject: Photoshop programmers tell us the parameters of your prompts. We need a prompt parameter that we can add that we state, "NO OFFENSIVE FILL." Simple solution to this problem.

PS community: You are here because you are cutting edge. You will become the most sophisticated AI graphics specialists. This is a fact.

If you want to get up to date on how prompts can and should work watch this video. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJez32MtfWU

IMHO, This whole concept of "small gen fill within a larger image" can work, but only with excellent prompts and nowhere yet do I see prompt training for PS gen fil. Again if you are into AI, please look at this video. It shows you where we will end up. Been out a month and has 8500 thumbs up.

This video will bring you update about what could be with PS prompt creation. (This video does not use PS software, but is how it can be done.) 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJez32MtfWU

Apparently the words "add flowey opaque turquoise tulle" is offensive - somehow? like what?

Eh. Complaining to Adobe is our God-given right, even if it's a beta. I think you just have to keep it polite and respectful, and if you do that, then any feedback, positive or negative, is beneficial for Adobe and the community.