P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Subject: Photoshop programmers tell us the parameters of your prompts. We need a prompt parameter that we can add that we state, "NO OFFENSIVE FILL." Simple solution to this problem.

PS community: You are here because you are cutting edge. You will become the most sophisticated AI graphics specialists. This is a fact.

If you want to get up to date on how prompts can and should work watch this video. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJez32MtfWU

IMHO, This whole concept of "small gen fill within a larger image" can work, but only with excellent prompts and nowhere yet do I see prompt training for PS gen fil. Again if you are into AI, please look at this video. It shows you where we will end up. Been out a month and has 8500 thumbs up.

This video will bring you update about what could be with PS prompt creation. (This video does not use PS software, but is how it can be done.) 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJez32MtfWU

Apparently the words "add flowey opaque turquoise tulle" is offensive - somehow? like what?

Eh. Complaining to Adobe is our God-given right, even if it's a beta. I think you just have to keep it polite and respectful, and if you do that, then any feedback, positive or negative, is beneficial for Adobe and the community.

THIS! If you (adobe) won't render an image on your cloud for whatever reason, let us render it ourselves on our own hardware.

Well, that's the unspoken rule for generative fill: no pretty women

Here's an example for me.

I want it to generate the bottom half of this picture. Note I am not putting in ANY textual prompt at all, so there is no possibility that a bad keyword triggered the behavior. Yeah the girl here is cute, but there's nothing sexual happening. There must be a boundless number of G-PG-13 bottom halves that could have been returned.

Interesting theory, but in the past it has created thumbs or hands or what-have-you and done a beautiful job with it. Not every fill is a home run, but it does a great job for me when it works.

Daniellei,

Re:But licensing other AI technologies isn't in Adobe's long-term plan with regard to FireFly. They want to use their own database of Adobe Stock images to generate outcomes...

Gaining technology fast is often about knowing your limits and acquiring technology, often through acquisitions, licencing, etc. I worked for a software company who acquired another company for $3 billion for their technology. Then we got acquired by a bigger company for our combined technology. Training on only Adobe stock would differentiate Adobe from MD. But using the best technology is a no brainer. Mary Barra just said GM will save $4oo million by using Tesla's charging technology, as will Ford.

The problem here is that no one seems to have the technology to gen fil small areas that is fully intergrated with a larger picture. 

But licensing other AI technologies isn't in Adobe's long-term plan with regard to FireFly. They want to use their own database of Adobe Stock images to generate outcomes, thereby being able to pay contributors whenever parts of their images are used to create other images. At least that's my understand from what I've read from other sources.  How they can ever manage to make this work is well beyond my comprehension, but that is apparently the plan. I don't THINK that will apply to Generative Fill in Photoshop, but once it is out of beta, Adobe will start charging people to use Adobe FireFly, probably through the purchase of credits, which Adobe says will be extremely generous in terms of what they charge for those credits.