I work for/with/teach pro colorsts, it’s the main group I visit with at NAB every year ... I’ve built a ton of LUTs over time ... but that said, I can’t see when I’d ever have that many LUTs in current use. Though we all work differently.

I can build a look faster than I can sort through a long list and try 2-3 LUTs ... so ... again, we’re all different.

But yeah, they should allow a much easier, more obvious way to handle LUTs in Premiere period.

Everyone's mileage always varies ...

R Neil Haugen

Legend

There is a limit as to how many user LUTs Premiere will load. I don't know an exact figure, but it is limited.

We all work differently, and I know some others really prefer looking through long LUT options. For me, I can get it looking as I want faster by just doing it than looking at 50 LUTs. But then, I've spent a lot of time doing the grading, in both Resolve and Premiere, and I've got a Tangent Elements control surface.

I like to do the grading, and for many, that is a painful thing to try. Hence ... many LUT options, like you have.

For those like unto you, and there are many out there! ... they should allow more user LUTs, and I've argued for years that they should allow users to sub-locate LUTs by specific folders within a Lumetri tab.

So you could have a subfolder of Cool Looks, Warm Looks, 70's Looks, whatever ... and quickly browse a specific set of LUTs.

THAT would be an awesome upgrade.

Everyone's mileage always varies ...

M