Skip to main content
Participant
Jul 3, 2023 5:09 PM UTC
Open for Voting

Add report option for incorrectly tagged AI-generated images

I've seen several other posts in other threads saying this but I just wanted to add my voice to the chorus and say that as a user of stock photography I'm sick of AI-generated images showing up in my searches even when I've selected to exclude them in the filters. There are certain users who keep showing up in my searches as doing this (when you go on their libraries it's wall-to-wall AI stuff, so I have to imagine it's an intentional thing). 

 

From what I've read this isn't against the rules currently but I just wanted to say I think it should be, and I'd like to be able to report or flag these posts. I know I can't do much as an artist against the tide of AI art but the least we can do is keep it separated from the more thoughtfully created stuff.

 

Thanks!

4 replies

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
Aug 14, 2024 4:38 AM UTC

Adobe is canceling AI accounts left and right. We see it here everyday, with someone asking why their account (or even accounts) was/were deactivated or banned. There's just so much crap, and I suspect Adobe is having trouble keeping up. Others have suggested a report button, but I think Adobe is concerned it would result in people making false reports. But just a guess.

Translate
Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.
Participant
Aug 14, 2024 4:19 AM UTC

Adobe is profiting, they do not care about the user just profits. 

Translate
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
Jul 4, 2023 6:07 AM UTC

Adobe claims that they detect AI thanks to AI, but that does not work in all cases. Having some kind of report button could be helpful, but how to protect it from abuse?

Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
fabrice+ducks
Known Participant
Jul 31, 2026 9:42 PM UTC

It seems to me that it would be a better workflow for Adobe to detect AI-generated files based on technical specifications rather than graphical details.

For example a script could open a .EPS or .AI file and inspect the layers panel. If every single element is tucked inside the same folder, chances are this illustration is AI generated. 
If the folders have names, structure, chances are it isn’t.

There are probably other technical determinants (for bitmap files for example), but the mass identification of vector files shouldn’t be too difficult.

There is another possibility which is that users could flag an image for suspicion of AI generated nature. In this case a user could filter out images with 10 or less flaggings, or 50 or less flagging, and above a certain number (if 200 people flag it?) the image would be removed from search engines, with a possible appeal process for the creator.

Just a few ideas.

Translate