Feature Requests

Adobe Stock really needs to implement a Ratings System so WE can provide feedback on Bad Stock Images, so others can avoid downloading the same file.  The Ratings Systems a simple 5 star system with comments section would serve to help the monthly subscribers, but also be a warning to content providers that you can't just upload pure crap.  I run across so many vectors that once you download and open the file you can tell it was nothing more than an image conversion from something already on the web.  We download vectors from Stock assuming it will be an original.  AI has only made things worse, many files are not at print resolution and should be labeled as such or at least with ratings I could read the reviews.  There is no way Adobe can monitor the quality of the ever growing library, we should have a way to help police the quality.  Ratings are such a common things, not sure why you have not implemented it already.

Guided Activities in Adobe Express is such a time saver for teachers. Is there a plan to add those types of lessons in Aqua?

The subject header says it all really. Working on an environmental documentary series that cannot use any generative AI images. Due to the amount of un labelled gen AI video, I'd decided against using any Adobe stock. However, I needed a few additional videos and went against my better instincts to download some previews. Then today I was dropping some of these into a timeline and out of the ten I'd downloaded, something seemed off and upon closer inspection at least 3 were gen AI . The responsibility shouldnt fall upon the user to police this, it should fall upon Adobe. Any supplier who cannot provide some form of proof of authenticity for non AI conetent shouldnt be allowed to label it as such. End of story. These very nearly went into the final cuts and as gen AI gets harder to spot it's going to become more of a problem. 

A search feature to search through already downloaded stock assets. 

Bonjour.Etant un client d'Adobe Stock, il m'arrive souvent de tomber sur des images proposées dans les résultats de recherche dont la qualité n'est pas du tout au rendez-vous. Aujourd'hui, mis à part le forum, il n'est pas possible pour un client de les signaler.Exemple sur cette photo :                                            N° de fichier :  304635841                                       Il faudrait avoir une solution plus simple pour les clients de pouvoir signaler une mauvaise qualité des fichiers proposés, depuis le panneau ''Report Issue'' par exemple qui ne permet que de signaler un abus de droits d'auteur ou de copyright à l'heure actuelle.S'il y a une autre méthode ce signaler ce genre d'image de mauvaise qualité évidente, faite-le moi savoir.Cordialem

“Fill Light” is one of the best modules within ACR. Unfortunately, it’s only available in process ver 2 and without the full masking control as seen in process ver 6. Requesting that the full masking control be available for process ver 2. 

Currently, Adobe Stock’s automated "Similar Content" filter frequently misinterprets variations in clinical pedagogy as duplicate spam. For instance, when submitting individual illustrations of different maxillary major connectors (e.g., Palatal Strap vs. Horseshoe Major Connector), the AI flags the files as identical because they share the same underlying background anatomy (the dental arch).Feature Suggestion: Please implement a specialized metadata or review sub-category for Educational, Technical, Medical & Dental Diagrams. The review algorithm for this specific category should prioritize text and metadata evaluation (such as changes in Kennedy Classifications or framework design terminology) over pure pixel-matching. This will prevent high-value instructional assets from being erroneously blocked by automated spam filters.Thank you for supporting specialized educational contributors.

Hi,   Envato has a filter to search for transparent videos. They download as transparent MOV files. No exrta work to mask out backgrounds. It's SO convenient.   Please add transparent videos to the Adobe Stock library.  They're so much easier to worth with for designers without as much video experience. Placing transparent videos over an image immediately adds dimension without doing a ton of extra work.   Adobe stock options like these or these say they're transparent, but when you download them they have a solid background. It's annoying. 

Estou em processo de melhorar do Workflow do meu Time com IA. E uma etapa bem demorada e trabalhosa é justamente a pesquisa de imagens e sons no Adobe Stock. E se subíssemos o roteiro e já surgisse uma lista de sugestões de imagens e músicas para comprar e baixar todas de uma só vez, ia ser muito mais rápido e prático.

Yesterday I’ve opened a request for refund as I got charged without knowing I didn’t cancel the whole plan from on first day of trial. Right away after charged yesterday I opened the ticket. But I got email that please go to help.adobe and all. I tried with the support chat, but ai assistant is keep saying I don’t have any open refund request with this email. I”m trying again n again I don’t know where to request refund or open refund request ?Can you share email or put me direct with the platform where I can get the refund  as it’s only 14 days window to request that, and it’s already 2nd day started

When I search for images and use the “exclude AI-generated images” filter, there are still many clearly AI-generated images showing up, which is frustrating. If contributor tagging cannot be controlled because it may be done maliciously, then please allow users to exclude those results for their own protection. I would like to be able to exclude specific contributors from the search results. It would also be useful to set multiple contributors, and I would appreciate it if those settings could be saved and kept once registered. Thank you.

I would like to suggest changing the current generative AI disclosure workflow.Instead of only asking contributors to check “Created using generative AI tools,” Adobe Stock should require contributors to actively choose one of the following options for every submission:This content was created using generative AI tools. This content was partially created or edited using generative AI tools. This content was not created using generative AI tools.When contributors select “This content was not created using generative AI tools,” Adobe should display a clear warning that false or misleading declarations may result in asset removal, royalty withholding, account suspension, and further action if the mislabeling causes legal, licensing, or customer trust issues.This would reduce accidental mislabeling, discourage intentional abuse, and protect both Adobe Stock customers and honest contributors.

Hello everyone! I have a featured request to adobe team. I have some complaints about the Adobe Stock Contributor system. If someone files something wrong or breaks the rules in Adobe Stock Contributor, Adobe blocks the account directly without any warning and also does not have any system to withdraw any dollars in the account.I think Adobe Direct should give the contributor some time and opportunity by giving a warning instead of blocking the account. Because it takes a lot of time and effort for a contributor to create an account and build a huge portfolio. Adobe should keep this in mind. And even if the account is blocked, Adobe should have a system in place to withdraw the remaining money in the account.Thank you for attention to this matter.

Hi, I’m trying to create a contributor account but get a “multiple accounts not allowed” message. I believe I haven’t created one before. Please check and help me recover or activate any existing account.

I’ve been extremely frustrated by misleading Adobe Stock graphic descriptions. This probably just applies to vectors. The platform is starting to be OVERRUN with AI-generated graphics claiming not to be AI. These typically look great on the preview, but once you download them, zoom in, and try to edit them it’s extremely obvious that they’re AI. Mostly because they’re always put together in a sloppy way that’s hard to edit, and don’t look nearly as good close up. I have on numerous occasions downloaded 20+ assets before I could find one that wasn’t AI, despite having the “exclude generative AI” filter on. Additionally, I’ve downloaded a ton of icons that claim to have editable strokes but don’t, and various graphics claiming to have editable text that don’t. I can’t even imagine how frustrating this must be for people who buy download packs rather than having a subscription. I understand that your team probably doesn’t have time to review every asset that gets posted, but it seems that

My default is to filter out AI, because I work for a reputable international travel agent, and don't want to damage our brand with that,But a lot of AI images and badly photoshoped fake "photos" appear - and "Report" only allows people/IP-copyright reporting - please allow Report -> "This is AI"

I note that there is a new library 'tray' that opens every time I save an asset to a library that sits at the bottom of the browser window. However, it's not moveable and covers the only navigation interface to move/go back to the next search results, forcing me to keep closing it. I find it hard to believe that the interface designers didn't see this issue.Additionaly:It's huge - it could be half the sizeIt looks like you should be able to drag and drop assets into the library (a good idea) but that doesn't workNot moveableNo option to hide it (which I would do immediately as it's just plain annoying).

I've noticed very poor quality AI-generated images showing up in my Adobe Stock searches. The only way to filter these out is to manually select a box "Exclude AI-generated Imagery" every single time I do a search. If I begin a new search it defaults back every single time to include AI-imagery.   I cannot use AI-generated imagery in my work as a designer. I am against the concept of it, and it's decimating the creative industries. Also, the images are horrible quality and not professional.   I need a way to permanently disable AI-imagery showing up in my searches. Adobe, can you please add this as a function to my account?   I also hope more creatives speak up about this in the comments below. I am considering leaving Adobe as a customer if they continue to push poor quality AI-generated content on their site.

As a stock contributor (Getty Images, Adobe Stock), accurate metadata is essential.After shooting industrial subjects (e.g., trawlers, machinery, harbor equipment), I currently use Google Lens to identify specific objects. I then manually enter this information in File > File Info (IPTC metadata) in Photoshop.When I submit the image to Getty Images, this metadata becomes visible during review. However, I still need to manually research and add relevant keywords to optimize search visibility.I propose integrating AI-based object recognition in Photoshop that can:Identify objects and technical components Suggest accurate object names Generate title and description suggestions Provide smart keyword suggestions (including related search terms) Automatically populate IPTC metadata fieldsThis would significantly streamline the professional stock workflow and improve contributor efficiency.

Necesito el reembolso de la suscripción porque anule dicha suscripción el mismo día del descuento 

Hello @adobe ,I am beginning to get frustrated about the fact that is is taking soooo long to improve the language of the adobe stock website.Problem (that has been there for years now): when I open the Adobe Stock website the language is in French. I live in Belgium (Flanders) and the language spoken here is Dutch. I know that Frenche is teached in schools here but the language spoken is Dutch.Questions: can you please improve the language module of adobe accounts???Ideas: 1 - change the settings for people in Belgium:- When people live in Flandersregion of Belgium, change the language standard to Dutch.- When people live in Walloon region of Belgium, change the language standard to French. 2 - If the first idea is so hard, please make it easier to change the language with a simple dropdow or switch at the top of the website. Please be so kind and make finaly make this change after al these years.

I am so tired of seeing sexulised content on the Adobe stock image site. I do not wish to see a womans n1pple!I really really dont.This has been a consitent issue for over a year now and I have written over 20 times to request a report image button. And for adequate people and checks to be in place to prevent this. PLEASE PLEASE PLASE address this issue I don't know how to communiate this further than i have.    [moderator deleted repeated text. Changed the subject for clarity. Moved from Bugs to Ideas]

With a wave of AI tools alowing people to upscale images to their hearts content, I've found my harddrive filling up because people are uploading 10k image sizes for stuff I just need in 1k, It's just an annoying work around to have to download the massive image, down size it to 1k then delete the massive one. We can already use ai to edit the image within the app, this seems like it'd be so much easier to implement into the stock website. 

I have a preview image with the number 12345678. I now need to purchase the image. I type in 1234 because I am lazy like the rest of you... Sorry, Image can't be found. But if I type the whole string it works. WHY?

I usually browse on my phone for inspiration and assets, and save them as favorites. Then when I’m on my computer, I go through those favorites and actually work with the files. But on mobile, the download button in the search results is so big that I’ve accidentally downloaded tons of assets I didn’t want, and they still count against my download balance. It often happens when you’re just trying to scroll and accidentally tap it. It would be great if this could be looked into — I don’t think I’m the only one experiencing this. One solution could be an extra confirmation popup on mobile like “Are you sure you want to download this?”, or making downloads only possible from the asset detail page. Cheers