My default is to filter out AI, because I work for a reputable international travel agent, and don't want to damage our brand with that,
But a lot of AI images and badly photoshoped fake "photos" appear - and "Report" only allows people/IP-copyright reporting - please allow Report -> "This is AI"
A better option is to report the image at the point of use, mark the assuet as under review, and notify the creators that they are posting low-quality content and wasting time creating it so it would hopefully discourage junk submissions. Last I checked a few weeks ago, the option to report copyright infringements is there but not grossly inaccurate composites or AI.
Reporting each of these images to a community forum is untenable. I have a full time job with deadlines and don't have time to post every instance of inaccurate and mislabeled assets. There's a laundry list of really bad user experience issues and so much junk AI submitted that I've contacted people in my company to change stock image vendors.
And the "artistic freedom" is also frustrating for a laundry list of reasons.
The inability to report AI or obviously Photoshopped to the point of inaccuracy, for example tigers that live in Asia on an African savanna next to elephants, is infuriating.
It's difficult enough to find images that can be used for educational resources, such as a textbook, and when completely inaccurate composites appear, it means the standard is low and other less obvious and inaccurate content is included in the collection. It's hard enough to get students to think critically and gaslighting them with fake images makes it worse. Spending an extra hour fact-checking accuracy of each stock image is exhausting.
Japanese castles, temples, and shrines require a property release if you want to sell them on Adobe Stock. Please contact Support to confirm that a property release has been submitted. Images that cannot be verified will likely be removed.