Please allow Report Image -> This is AI

Steps to Report Mislabeled AI

Yes to that! 100%

I work for editorial contents and we’re supposed to tell the public everytime we show an AI item. But so many images are unlabelled AI. Even vector assets are juste AI badly vectorised in Illustrator that you have to clean yourself...

Everyday I want to report some images but the only two options are :

• Content contains the names of people (including artists' names)

• Content may infringe on IP rights (such as copyright, design, or trademark rights, model or property rights)

We should also be able to report a user for review.

I'm using one of the multiple "Report AI" feature request threads to report this image https://stock.adobe.com/images/-/1726127809

and other images of this author, pretty much everything looks generated and unmarked.

(Why do I think it's AI? Misspellings, random lines, chatgpt font)

A better option is to report the image at the point of use, mark the assuet as under review, and notify the creators that they are posting low-quality content and wasting time creating it so it would hopefully discourage junk submissions. Last I checked a few weeks ago, the option to report copyright infringements is there but not grossly inaccurate composites or AI. 

Reporting each of these images to a community forum is untenable. I have a full time job with deadlines and don't have time to post every instance of inaccurate and mislabeled assets. There's a laundry list of really bad user experience issues and so much junk AI submitted that I've contacted people in my company to change stock image vendors. 

And the "artistic freedom" is also frustrating for a laundry list of reasons. 

This is a good suggestion. They could also add a text field for describing "other problems".

The inability to report AI or obviously Photoshopped to the point of inaccuracy, for example tigers that live in Asia on an African savanna next to elephants, is infuriating.

It's difficult enough to find images that can be used for educational resources, such as a textbook, and when completely inaccurate composites appear, it means the standard is low and other less obvious and inaccurate content is included in the collection. It's hard enough to get students to think critically and gaslighting them with fake images makes it worse. Spending an extra hour fact-checking accuracy of each stock image is exhausting. 

Japanese castles, temples, and shrines require a property release if you want to sell them on Adobe Stock.
Please contact Support to confirm that a property release has been submitted.
Images that cannot be verified will likely be removed.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/known-image-restrictions.html