P: Character limit restricts image descriptions (merged thread)

The bottom image is I’m sorry the bottom image was created 100% by firefly and my prompt asking for like a child circus type of atmosphere

The other image I accidentally put in there. I couldn’t remove it. They make it difficult to do this quickly but yeah, that one is just something else I was working on it probably five or six different photos blended together, but the top one with the child is 100% generated by firefly the bottom one I don’t think there’s any firefly involved

That is the child I asked for angry robbery face something like that. Tell me that kid is not a child Donald Trump nope the ear that firefly was definitely trying to create a young Trump. I’m confident of it. That’s also look at the crazy things in the background I was asking for basic stuff. This image is demented and it was created by firefly. I prompt did not exactly look for what you’re looking at there

yes

How about that Adobe bring seedance 2.5 and seedream 5.0 pro to the US and full 50 reference limit for seedance

I vote that Adobe leaves AI stuff with companies that are good at it and stop treating paying subscribers as beta testers.

Ok so …I have prompts I noticed that get freaked out images… now if I say bloody rubber toy doll ..NO ..bouncing rubber babies with rage ..no …so I asked for an elderly man and the photo I planned on using is the top of an elevator shaft as I’m a tech and work on that equipment so I have a lot of interesting spots to mess with ..ok so it did that …only the feet were bare and blue and toes down …dangling over the hoist way to leave VEIW obviously the more pleasant side of a hanging …but no rubber bouncing baby breaking guidelines ! I can go on like the young Donald Trump with bullet shot ear and all.i asked for a bratty kid ..i love the wild and obvious terrible product all image generated stuff is ..i use the credits in succession just to see what it will do ..and i can’t save em ..its fun but not y i pay for adobe ,infact now that if you so much as hit a wand the image is tagged as if im helping adobe make art ..like when I paint I don’t tell anyone that my spray paint is so dope look what it did !! Naa we all are turned off ..you obviously missed the plot on art as whole ..it’s all infringement always was and nothings wrong ..if Brit’s didn’t remind the USA we had a culture gold mine musically…but Keith Richard is nobody u knew if he didn’t have Chuck to …violate ..this is how I feel u make a lot of us feel cheap for using your tools to make a minds eye project..not your mind ..mine but mine has an adobe watermark claiming credit …look u claim credit for garbage more than gold I assure u and idk if u have half the customers in 12 months everyone I know is ready to learn a new flow ..you don’t understand what a paint brush is …u don’t that’s what this meta data tells us 

To clarify the problem: Firefly models aren't rendering what the keywords describe. For instance, when I enter "St. Stephen's Cathedral at Stephansplatz," the result is a church that either doesn't look like the actual cathedral or appears heavily distorted. I have to say that the cathedral was rendered correctly when I first started the subscription; And now FIrefly doesn´t work out correctly.This is my feedback. 

Can the issue be forwarded to Adobe management?

MFG Silvia