Skip to main content
Inspiring
October 26, 2014
Open for Voting

P: Increase Supported File Dimensions

  • October 26, 2014
  • 43 replies
  • 2849 views

I would appreciate if LR would support images with 65k x 65k pixels (i.e. drop the overall 512M-pixel limit). I have several stiched images, that I can not handle with Lightroom, and I do not want to use two different Applications to manage my images.

P.S. and please make the limit 2^16 x 2^16 and not 65000x 56000.

43 replies

TheDigitalDog
Inspiring
September 7, 2022

Bob: https://www.gadgetmatch.com/samsung-450-megapixel-camera-sensor-trademark/

There is no excuse for Lightroom Classic to cripple the full PSB support found in Photoshop. None IMHO. 

Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management/pluralsight"
johnrellis
Legend
September 7, 2022

The Hasselblad H6D-400c produces 400 MP images (about $50K).  

 

I think a somewhat more common use-case is a high-megapixel panorama generated from 50 - 100 MP input images.  

Bob Somrak
Legend
September 7, 2022

Which cameras are exceeding 400 megapixels per shot.

M4 Pro Mac Mini. 48GB
Known Participant
September 7, 2022

As cameras are exceeding 400 megapixels per shot now I think it's time for Lightroom to start lifting limits accordingly. Lightroom's Photo Merge crashes on large files where Photoshop does not. Photo Merge limits appear to be much lower than Photoshop's so lifting these limits would really help and allow us to do more in Lightroom and less in Photoshop. Lightroom's 512 megapixel JPEG file size limit is particualrly frustrating to me and one that I'd love to see increased. Thank you!

Guy Samson
Participant
July 20, 2022

I agree with this. I normally do my panos in Lightroom. Sometimes, I do them in Photoshop. If Photoshop can do the stitching, then why can't Lightroom import it back ?

MaynardK
Participating Frequently
May 9, 2022

Got it. You are right.

johnrellis
Legend
May 8, 2022

"So, I am not sure of the point you are trying to make, sorry."

 

I was responding to your last sentence:

 

"It looks like a previous member reported a 512MP limit, but I think it is a 512MB limit. Please correct me, if wrong."

 

Thus I corrected you -- it's 512 megapixels (MP) not 512 megabytes (MB).

MaynardK
Participating Frequently
May 8, 2022

Sorry, I am missing something. First, I was wrong, the jpg did not import. I had created a "small" version that did get imported, but it was not the same resolution.

You are restating the limitation that the OP originally requested to be changed, which I agree with. I understand the limitation, that is why I said that I agree with others in this thread that it be increased. So, I am not sure of the point you are trying to make, sorry.

The good news is that it does open in Photoshop. The bad news is that it does not even create a placeholder in the LRC catalog so that I can remember it is on my disk (one of the reasons I use LRC to catalog all my photos). I'll rename the low resolution version something like "low_res_version full res is in same file folder-open it in PS.jpg".

johnrellis
Legend
May 7, 2022

"It is a tif file, 55765 x 15769"

 

That's a total of 55,765 * 15,769 = 879,358,285 pixels, or 879 megapixels.  LR's maximum size is 512 MP, with no more than 65,000 pixels per side. See the very bottom of this help article:

https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/help/supported-file-formats.html

MaynardK
Participating Frequently
May 7, 2022

FYI, it is a pano of the complete view of the Milky Way, if interested 🙂