Skip to main content
Participant
February 19, 2024
Open for Voting

Dust spot removal AI tool

  • February 19, 2024
  • 6 replies
  • 2967 views

I’m certain I’m not the first person to submit this request, but it’s a Photoshop update that would really save me a ton of time today, so I figured I’d add a (possiblly) redundant request to your pile and (maybe) help tilt the scale in the direction of adding a tool to the next update.

 

Dust spots are a ubiquitous nuisance in the life of digital photographers (even for shooters like me, who are pretty vigilant about cleaning sensors and swapping lenses in relatively dust-free environments). Given the advancements in AI, it seems like the Photoshop could easily integrate a one-click dust removal filter that would save guys like me a significant amount of time in post when we’re dealing with deep dept-of-field exposures.

 

There are several paid third-party plugins for this. The best (in my research) is produced by Retouch4Me [Link removed by moderator] I routinely use several Retouch4Me AI filters to help streamline my portrait retouching workflow (they tend to be on the expensive side, but the ROI is sufficient to make me feel good about those purchases). Still, $87 for their dust removal plugin seems excessive because the scourge of dust spots is so ever-present in digital photography that a native dust-removal AI filter really ought to be standard for software suites like Photoshop and Lightroom.

 

And, yes, I’m familiar with the more granular tools and techniques for dust spot removal, but I’m dealing with big skies and deep depth-of-field in my current project, which really makes every little dust spot pop and it occurs to me that (given how much I spend and have spent on CC products) I shouldn’t have to pay a third party for a feature that so clearly ought to be bundled standard with products like Photoshop and and would spare me from so much tedium.

 

Thanks for your consideration.

6 replies

GoldingD
Legend
January 20, 2025
Participant
April 19, 2024

This would potentially also be very useful for underwater photography, where the most tedious and time consuming aspect of post-processing is usually removal of backscatter caused by strobe light reflecting off of particulates in the water.

Stephen Marsh
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 19, 2024

You're right (no rose-tinted lenses here), despite all of that, the dust was horrendous! 

c.pfaffenbichler
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 19, 2024

Well, I only worked with flatbed-scanners, but cleaning the oiled (or gel-ed) transparencies was no fun … so I for one do not miss the dominance of analogue photography. 

Stephen Marsh
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 19, 2024

I remember the drum scanner operators using compressed air in their drum mounting "clean room" and then oiling the transparencies. Were the old days better?  😕😕

c.pfaffenbichler
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 19, 2024

I am not sure that such features »so clearly ought to be bundled standard«, but an AI-based approach to the issue does seem like a valid feature request. 

 

As I (previously more and nowadays only very occasionally) have to work with scans an AI-based approach for remedying the dust typical to those (black for film, white for reflective) might also be worth consideration.