Feature Requests

Adobe Photoshop remains the industry standard for image editing and print production workflows. However, the packaging, label, and commercial printing industries are rapidly adopting Extended Gamut and multi-channel production technologies that go beyond traditional CMYK printing.Modern production environments increasingly utilize: Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black, Orange, Green, Violet, WhiteWhile Photoshop supports Spot Channels and Multichannel documents, these additional inks are not handled as native process channels. This results in:additional manual work increased production complexity loss of non-destructive editing higher risk of production errors limitations in modern print workflowsOnce Orange, Green, Violet and White are managed as Spot Channels:Adjustment Layers become limited Smart Objects lose flexibility Color corrections become more complicated Late-stage revisions require additional work Flattening often becomes necessaryWhite Ink is no longer a special effect. It has bec

Dear Adobe Photoshop Team,I am a professional architectural and hospitality photographer, and I would like to suggest a feature that could significantly improve the Generative AI workflow for photographers working with multiple images of the same scene.The idea is to allow users to reuse a previously generated AI result across a sequence of photographs, while automatically adapting it to different camera angles and perspectives.For example, imagine photographing a hotel dining area from several angles. Using Generative Fill, I might add a beautifully arranged breakfast to a table in the first photograph.Currently, generating the same breakfast in another photograph can produce completely different food, plates, glasses, and arrangements, even when using exactly the same prompt.Ideally, Photoshop could offer a "Reuse Previous Generation" or "Generation Consistency" option.This could work through a simple checkbox or a generation history panel, allowing users to: Select a previously gene

Every so often I run into a situation where I've created a full bleed design but when I go to set it up to print I realize that I forgot to include the bleed area past the trim line. Where this is especially annoying is when it is a photograph or piece of art that I don't really want to enlarge to account for the bleed.A work around is copying and then reflecting the image on each edge and butting it up against the trim line. Also, you can generative fill the bleed area. Both of those tactics work, but they are annoying.It would be awesome if there was a simple button to press where you said "create bleed" and you could set the size of the bleed you wanted and AI would just generate the bleed for you without any fuss. This would have to be in Photoshop.Maybe this is just a me problem, lol, but we have the technology!!

The WebP format is now supported by all major browsers, is a new Web standard, and is much more efficient than PNG or JPG (much lighter and better quality files). Photoshop can export to WebP, but the operation is (unnecessarily) complicated: You have to change the color method, but it could do it automatically when exporting. WebP is not among the options in the "Export" function, you have to use "Save As", but it doesn't always work, then you have to try "Save a Copy". These are all nonsense. Please add full support for WebP format!

You make package photoshop and lightroom who was 10$ before no contract now it’s 44$ cad per month no contract or all the app for 100$ per month and it was 75$ beforebut why not let people choose 4 apps and make their combo for a good price We want A combo package with Photoshop, Lightroom, Premiere Pro, and After Effects! Four apps for a good monthly price! but it’s still too expensive! Not everyone can commit to a one-year contract!We want to be free like netflix do! Pay per month no contract! It’s now abusive! I unsubcribed to all Adobe products for another option! Also stop making it so difficult to cancel subscription  

Please allow selection tools such as crop and marquis to approach arbitrarily close to the edge of an image without automatically snapping to the edge whenever the user gets close to it.  It’s annoying to have to zoom way in to be able to place the edge of the crop mask near, but not on, the edge of the image.

Photoshop already has a powerful remove tool and it can already automate the removal of people, wires, and other distractions, but why can't it remove dust, dirt, and scratches? I'm primarily work with film and other analog media and dust is the bane of my existence. I would love to have this automated feature added to photoshop.

When I select the crop tool or any other tool, the tool options window obscures the bottom 21% of the image area on my laptop screen (I measured it).  Every time I select a tool, I have to manually minimize the options window to regain access to my entire image.Please make the tool options windows moveable so they can be resized and relocated to be out of the way, and make them retain that size and location the next time they are opened.  That should lower the blood pressure of PSe users everywhere!And the Crop Suggestions would not likely be missed by many, if any users if they were to disappear entirely.

The title say it all. 

Customizable Save As Menu Photoshop’s Save As workflow is currently based on a fixed, predefined list of file formats. An optional feature in Preferences could allow users to fully customize this menu to match their workflow while preserving the current behavior as the default.Proposed Features1. Custom Format VisibilityUsers could choose which formats appear in the Save As menu.Unused formats could either:be completely hidden, or remain visible but disabled/grayed out.This would significantly reduce menu clutter while still preserving discoverability.2. Custom Format OrderingUsers could drag and reorder formats according to their needs.For example:PSD TIFF PNG JPEG PDFinstead of scrolling through a long list of rarely used legacy formats.3. Keyboard SelectionUsers could assign number keys to formats.Example:1 = PSD2 = PNG3 = JPEG4 = TIFFWhen the Save As dialog opens, pressing a single number key would immediately select the desired format.4. Save PresetsUsers could assign one or more

Photoshop supports about 20 formats, but I only use 4 or 5 of them. It's bugged me since 5.5 to have to fish for jpeg somewhere in the middle of the list. Can the file formats get arranged by most commonly used? And maybe allow us to remove stuff like targa and large file format that nobody uses.

Hi. I thought that this would be an obvious question, but how come we can't warp a selection in more than one layer at once? I could expand that question to the Transform function without it selecting the boundaries of the whole document? Crikey, it's been like this for 20 years or so. Time for an improvement perhaps.

NO MORE DETAILS TO GIVE 

Please make it so I can choose my default action when using C (crop tool) as I rarely need transparent background and 95% of the time I need it to be Generative expand. Make a checkmark to chose the default behaviour or just make it so it automatically selects the same option as the last time you used the tool. it's just super annoying to select the same options every single time you use the tool.

The Export As workflow cannot be completed from the keyboard alone. While ESC is the same as Cancel, Return or Enter do not do Export like I expect.Every time I have to use my trackpad to move the cursor over the Export button and then press the “button”.I am on a Mac.  

De par mon expérience, il serait utile de disposer, en plus de l’icône globale, d’une icône ( œil ) Activer/Désactiver la Visibilité en face de chaque critère pour évaluer l’effet produit.Exemple: 

Hola comunidad, soy Pablo, necesito saber si puedo instalar una versión intermedia, ya que las ultimas versiones, no me cargan totalmente, gracias

I'd love a setting that would allow me to preserve aspect ratio while scaling in Illustrator without holding Shift, like it is by default in Photoshop.I often jump back and forth between Photoshop and Illustrator on jobs, and it’s frustrating to me that these two programs aren’t in sync on whether you need to hold the Shift key to preserve aspect ratio while scaling an object. I know Photoshop allows you to choose the legacy setting where you need to hold Shift to preserve aspect ratio, but I’d rather it be the other way around, where both applications allowed you to preserve aspect ratio without holding Shift.I don’t want to upset the workflows of Illustrator users accustomed to holding Shift, so could a setting be added to Illustrator’s Preferences to allow users to opt-in to this synchronized behavior?

Let us rename the RAW file in the smart object, that's it!I've spent hours chatting with adobe agents on this subject with no result on what should be a relatively simple function. The smart object is not linked so I should be able to name it whatever I want without consequences to my work and/or workflow. thanks

Image Size Preview I wish there was a way to turn off the Image Size Preview, before I resize... 🙊 when working on a very large file you have to wait for the process bar to 'Build the Preview' every time you change a value.  I don't particularly see the value in having a preview window here, but if it is to stay please at least allow users to turn off the preview BEFORE resizing a very large file  Thanks

Please allow me to turn off image size preview in  image size dialog box. I have to convert 12000 pixel images with 40 layers down  to 1080 and the preview takes waaaaayyyyyy too long. My production time suffers greatly. I do not need to see the preview

After going back with Chat for over an hour to get Photoshop to work for me properly, plus countless hours working around what feels like the buggiest photoshop ever…. I had Chat write the below for me. Chat clearly knows me, so gave you a little background…. Subject: Please stop introducing workflow changes that interfere with established Photoshop habitsI have been a professional Photoshop user for many years, and I rely on Photoshop for real production work. I understand that the application needs to evolve, and I have no objection to adding new capabilities, including AI.What I am increasingly frustrated by is the number of new behaviors and interface changes that seem to be introduced without enough consideration for users who have spent decades developing extremely fast, muscle-memory-based workflows.Recently I have had to hunt down several settings that changed the way Photoshop behaves in ways I did not ask for and did not expect.For example:1. Spring-loaded Tool ShortcutsI sud

WHAT'S THE POINT OF THAT??!?!?!? YOU'RE RUINING THE ENTIRE WORKFLOW WITH THIS!!! BRING BACK SCROLLING IN BLENDING MODE, AND I WANT THE BRIGHTNESS AND CONTRAST TO STAY EXACTLY THE WAY THEY WERE BEFORE!!!! NO ONE NEEDS THE CHANGES YOU KEEP MAKING HERE!!!

Avec les versions précédentes, pendant l’enregistrement du travail en cours, il était possible de continuer à travailler sur l’image.Avec cette nouvelle version, cela n’est plus possible et cela génère une perte de temps dommageable.Cette nouvelle fenêtre d’enregistrement est inutile, la progression dans la barre d’état en bas à gauche de la fenêtre suffisait comme information.Je vous serais très reconnaissant de revenir à la fonctionnalité précédente.

Just one of those things that i've always thought could come in REALLY handy. I have no idea how the actuality of this function would work due to all the possible complexities of the contents within a layer group... but wow, i often think i'd love to clip some adjustment layers to a Layer Group. I am aware of the Pass through to Normal feature but it doesn't really cut it.