Smooth Skin Feature in Premiere Pro (Tracked beauty filters like tiktok, but designed for pros)

If anyone have low budget graphic, they can give also advance level video in Capcut, and don't need to pay more for plugin in Capcut, also da Vinci is best compared to premiere pro, we also leave premier pro two month ago, easily everything done in Capcut with tecnic. Also for YouTuber best Capcut. need to much improvement in premiere pro, plugin also will be taken more load and it will slow premier pro and also pc. While Capcut is fast no need to any external plug in 🤣🤣🤣

For non-pro users, capcut beauty is MUCH easier to use -- so why can't premiere pro figure out how to make that an integrated, easy to use feature???

I have tried premiere pro plugins and couldn't figure them out.

I have taken several courses and still PP had glitches that just didn't work (not just for beauty -- I finally gave up on basic edits as they didn't work on the program as shown in the courses actually on their site).

We know that PP has many other better features, which is why we still try to learn & use it. But the beauty features are critical -- and should be integrated, easy-to-use, and not such a complete PIA.

Sorry but that's just an odd sounding post.

90% of Premiere users have left to go to ... Capcut? Really?

Capcut simply is so freaking limited overall compared to Premiere or Resolve, both of which I use. Resolve's editing stuff is still somewhat limited compared to Premiere, but it's way above Capcut.

Would I like more beauty tools in Premiere? Of course. But if you use it for pay, there's several excellent add-ons out there that do a great job of it. For minimal cost in any relative term.

I use some personally.

90% user also has been leaved premiere pro because in Capcut no need extra plugin and no need higher graphic card 

Video editing is sometimes using the right tool for the job and every feature added costs money. Premiere has other strengths like easy to use  multi cam that most other apps can't touch.

I work for/with/teach pro colorists, mostly based in Resolve. I spend more time in Resolve than Pr because of that ... and am currently running the R19  public beta, working on tutorials for pro colorists using Resolve's newer features and also using Tangent's new "Warp engine" mapping software in Resolve with Tangent panels.

Beauty work is a frequent request these days for colorists, one that some love to do, and that many others ... grumble grumble grumble ... about, though never loud enough the client hears the grumbles. Ha.

I know rather a lot of pro colorists, both Resolve and Baselight based. I don't know any that do much beauty work, that actually use Resolve's built-in tool. A major continuous discussion among colorists is which outside tool they are using for any "X" work in Resolve and what results they get from it. Especially beauty.

But then, all the Resolve colorists I know have at least one extensive, expensive suite of plugins installed. Typically, at least a full Boris, probably also the full Maxon/Red Giant, and some tools from others.

So they spend far more per year for plugins, typically twice, than Pr users do for a full CC subscription. And editors complain about buying a single plug-in here and there. I find that humorous ... 

There are 3rd party plugins to do this from within Premiere.  

This is the one I use

https://www.sheffieldsoftworks.com/beauty/mua/index.html

They've been very helpful when I've had any issues or questions.   Not cheap but worth it.  

how can i get

unbelievable. i was sure this was built in. absolute no brainer. seems like i am wasting my time and money with this so called "pro" software. what a shame.

So until that happens, I'm headed right now over to Filmora, which has these features, and will have to pay there, in addition to paying for Premiere Pro.  And that means that most likely my brand new annual Premiere Pro membership will be worthless.  Not happy.