Build better products with our product team
I'm using light room on Android. <deleted> And if I saved as a copy, the Exif Metadata not maintain the original creation date... So to give my example. I want to edit a photo, apply some filters and effects, after I don't want to keep the original. And if I tried to post it Facebook or Instagram from the apps the new photos (edited) keeps on top... losing the original chronology... and this is really bothering. Hope soon apply some feature to allow this... maybe is not expected on all cases, but add an option to "save and replace original" Regards
I hope that Adobe could add a function to the slideshow in Lightroom, namely to sort the slideshow in a random way. Right now you have to sort the slideshow by creation date or change date or similar. Regards Kenneth
I have been attempting to use this effect to display Metadata burnt into the video; Specificaly, I had the EXIF tool wrote Metadata into the source Media for location and recorded/created date. I think there is a bug in the effect; many fields, will not display in the program monitor, despite there being clear data one can view, and even edit in the project window; This is the effect setting: (Description will appear Line 1, But Line 2 data will not) The Project window you can clearly see that there is Data in the Tape Name Field: The program monitor will properly display Line 1, Description. But many other fields despite being visable in the project metadata viewer will not display/burn in on the program monitor. Can someone please advise if I am doign this wrong, or if this is a bug thats repeatable for others? Adobe Premier 25.3 Windows 11 Pro For Workstations 24H2 Nvidia 3090 Studio Drivers Source Material is Iphone footage. Metadata has been written/updated with EXIFTOOL; Here is a sample, its not for the exact same clip shown above, but the same data was written the same way to 141 files, I was just lazy to match up the exact same file, but I assure you this happens on all 141 clips. Also; fields like "comment" also do not burnin, and are blank when used in Premier pro - that would be my ideal field to use, but I am looking for any field I could use right now to allow me to show creation date of the clip as a seperate field from The geolocated data that appears in "description" now. I am at a loss as to why this is not working, I have created multip projects, and restarted with new clips with clean metadata, and also manualy entered the metadata into the project metadata viewer. No matter how, many fields such as comment, tapename and others do not get burnt into the video. Decription for example works on any line, all the ones that dont work, also dont work on any line within the metadata viewer effect. I have been tinkerign with this for hours now and I think I have figured out whats going on. It seems that if you update the Metadata with the EXIFTOOL After you import the files, its hit/miss if the Metadata is properly processed. It seems that you have to have all the metadata updated to the clip prior to importing the clips, or it will not work properly, often the metadata is visable in the project metadata viewer, but will not work for the burn in. Sometimes Premier doesnt refreash the metadata from the file, and its not visable anywhere. Even if you close the project and open it again I also tried creating a new project after all the metadata was applied, and for smaller projects (line 15 clips) the import process works flawless and I can get "description" and "log Notes" to both work; However in imports with more files, my sample was 141 clips, most of the clips fail to have have the metadata appear. This might have something to do with the background process I have enabled for transcrips and media idetification. I will try at some point to turn those off and import the same sampel set of 141 clips to see if the same issue persists. Basicaly, there is some unpredicale behavior with the metadata after its imported. There are times where I can update the Metadata, and literaly see the "generating peaks" appear for the clips that are imported, and the new metadata that was written by Exiftool becomes visabl ein premier project fields, but it will not allow the burnin effect to read and display them. The onyl way to get it to work was to create a clean new project, and then it worked - expect for the potential inteference of the background processes with more than half of the 141 clips I am testing with. Any advice would be welcome.
Hello!PREMIERE RPO - GENERATIVE OBJECT REMOVALknow if this is still years away or is "coming soon" as Adobe touted last year. Gen AI extend is handy in my timeline, but gen AI obect removal like the funtionality Photoshop would be a game changer.
Hello Adobe Team,I would like to suggest adding a dedicated option in Premiere Pro’s export settings to control the Color Range (Full 0–255 vs Limited 16–235) for video exports, especially for H.264 and H.265 codecs.Currently, there is no direct way to choose or force full range color levels during export, which often results in washed-out or desaturated colors on platforms like Instagram and sometimes YouTube. This leads to extra steps and workflows involving external tools to convert color levels after export, complicating the process.Having this option built directly into Premiere Pro would greatly improve color accuracy and streamline the export workflow for professional users working with social media and online video platforms.Thank you for considering this feature!Best regards,[Marina]
Hi Team, I’m Saurabh Shukla from India a software engineer by profession and a travel content creator by passion. I love using Lightroom Mobile, especially for color grading on the go. However, I’ve noticed that videos with camera movement (like pans or tracking shots) become jittery after export, even though the original footage is smooth. Static clips don’t have this issue. It seems like the export process struggles with motion-based footage. Suggestions: Add motion optimization (e.g. frame blending or smoothing). Provide export settings (Resolution, FPS, Bitrate) to give users more control. Would really appreciate if there’s a fix or if improvements are planned. Thanks for the great work on the app! Best, Saurabh Shukla shuklaje012@gmail.com | @Streetwala
Please send this suggestion to the highest level: I've exported many books from Lightroom's Book MOdule to Blurb. What's missing is the 8x10 trade (softcover) option. The 8x10 hardcover costs me from $60 to $140 depending on length of my book. Even with the 20- 30% discount blurb offers me (so I can buy in bulk) I'd be charging more than the market can bear. On other hand , the magazine options and Blurb's softback trade options (designed through theri Bookwright templates) are reasonably priced. PLEASE add an 8x10 paperback to your options! By the way, the book module has never been improved since I've been using it (10-15 years, I bet). Isn't it time? For example, how about a way to lock in the positions of your photo and text cells? Or a proper ruler?
It would be useful to have a search tool to selecte inactive users at the storage section of the Admin Console. Otherwise an endless list of users is displayed where is impossible to select a specific user. Without this tool is useless to keep stored the files folders of the old users because is imposible to locate them.
In the Effect Controls panel the keyframe navigation buttons still overlap with the value fields (like Position, Scale, etc.), making the buttons nearly unclickable without resizing the panel. Despite it appearing to be a relatively easy issue to fix, it has persisted through at least a decade of Premiere updates and there are no signs of it changing anytime soon. However, with the increased focus on UI in recent updates, I'm hoping this is a good time to shed some light on the issue. (appologies for the flickering in the gifs below) This is what I'm referring to: The image below is the minimum possible width the panel must be in order to click all three keyframe buttons: In order to view more of the timeline portion of the panel while still being able to click the keyframe buttons, the Effect Controls panel as a whole ends up taking quite a lot of realestate: This is obviously not a critical issue and there are many ways to work around it or avoid it, but this doesn't mean it should never be fixed. I have spent many years in this program, and my workflows, shortcuts, and layouts are ever evolving and changing. But this is one issue that I still find myself running into consistently. These keyframe navigation buttons are simply the most obvious, intuitive, and natural way to skip ahead to the next keyframe, and it would be nice to finally see a simple fix to such a long lasting UI issue.
It would be helpful to add the ability to scroll or toggle between different asset updates directly within Adobe Assets Reviews. This would allow reviewers to compare “before” and “after” versions more easily during feedback rounds, especially when reviewing visual changes or iterations.
Hello, I am a beginner with Adobe 3D sampler, and I was following the "First Steps with Substance 3D Sampler" tutorial, and while following the tutorial, I noticed that there are massive changes to the UI for 3D sampler. The version they used in the videos is quite old, and I noticed that big changes were made(*) in February of this year (2025).Is it possible to update these tutorials? (*) Some elements were removed, and some have been moved to other places, also the provided file does not work with the latest version and looks very different from video.------Regards FrancoisHave a nice day!
Love the new Lens Blur feature but the blurred area is too smooth and doesn't match the parts of the photo in focus, it would help to add a slider to manually, or better automatically, match the noise (similar to Blur Gallery filters in Photoshop).A temporary fix is to add noise to entire photo. Attached a detail of an area affected by lens blur next to in focus.
Lumetri's color wheels need tonal range definition sliders like It existed in the old three way color corrector and how It exist in every serious color trading software.It Is needed ti fully control what Is influenced by every single wheel.
Lumetri has only three wheels. Everybody knows there should be a fourth one (like in Resolve and like the chained three wheel in the old three way color corretor).One for shadows, one for midtones, one for highlights and a fourth one for global adjustment.
I like to label clips with colors as my video is playing. I wasn't expecting the Selection Follows Playhead feature to only work once I pause. It would be nice for the clip selection to continuously update while the timeline is playing.
Hi all,I've been editing mostly multi-cam footage in Premiere Pro and I'm always finding ways to optimize my workflow. When I want to see the lenght of a clip that was edited by multi-cam or just any clip, I need to hover over the timeline object (clip). This is not a hard or tedious thing to do, but the latency of waiting for the info to show if I want to check all the clips in the timeline makes up to considerable time.My proposal or question (if there's a plugin that could do this):Having a dynamic indicator after recording multi-cam position/value in the corner of the clip on the timeline. Similar to the indicator when a clip is out of sync, but maybe using a different corner of the clip and/or colour. Hopefully I explained the idea well. This would be very useful for other edit scenarios like music videos or any kind of geometrical or mathematical approach to editing where seeing the lenght of the clip is important either to match frames with other clips, match audio of certain lenght with clips or just editing by time for any kind of geometrical layout. Maybe it's a far fetched comparison, but similar to the way some composers composed their music. In a specific case, when a studio implements rules for editing like "no single shot should be shorter than 3 seconds" this would be an useful way to be able to glance across the timeline clips and see if any is not too short. Additional improvements on this system would be something like an ability to set scenarios in which the clip duration indicator would show in different colors depending on parameters, or so it would show up JUST if the clip matches/does not match given parameters in the settings. Last behaviour is similar to the out of sync indicator which shows only when synced clips have been moved. I attached a mockup how I imagine this would look on a single clip where in 15:19 it indicates 15s19f, so if a clip is longer than one minute it would show for example 1:15:19 as 1m15s19f Thanks in advance for your support and any community feedback on this idea.Matija
Please change the way Premiere Pro reads video metadata tagging to allow the import of AVC codec .MOVs. We recently switched to Adobe Premiere Pro but our archive library contains tens of thousands of .MOVs that are rewrapped .MXFs. The initial rewrapping was done as part of an older workflow within FCPX. The video files are now tagged "aivx" which is AVC-Intra VBR. Rewrapping the entirety of our archive is out of the question so this software change within Premiere Pro would be extremely valuable to us. A little more background: I scoured the internet for something to rewrap an MOV to MXF. After rewrapping the file using a program called Filestar, Premiere Pro allowed the import (the video data now being tagged "AVC" instead of "aivx" as seen in MediaInfo) and the file works wonderfully! Out of curiousity, I rewrapped that newly wrapped MXF file to MOV using a piece of software called EditReady and it no longer imports into Premiere Pro, but I can rewap again to MXF in Filestar and Premiere Pro imports it. I can repeat this rewrapping process forever, never changing the video data itself. So there's something with the way Premiere Pro handles the tagging of the video data of the MOVs and there's nothing wrong with the video data itself.
Adobe! It would be super useful to have a way to enter verbal directions or prompts to the Adaptive B & W and Adaptive Color feature such that one can let the AI know your intentions are and guide it, so it can help one create the perfect photo adustements. As it is, the back-and-forth process with the Adaptive tool is hit or miss, since the AI is just "guessing" in a sense. Understand? Thanks, Eric Platt
Na tela de Geração de Imagens e na tela do Histórico de Geração, deveria ter um modo ajustar a resolução/quailidade das imagens geradas, similar ao ajuste Tamanho de Imagem no Photoshop (cmnd+opt+i). Para evitar o gasto excessivo de energia, poderia gerar imagens nas resoluções atuais, mas quando fosse salvar a imagem, teriam opções com resoluções maiores com as texturas otimizadas (ver imagem de exemplo).As vezes consigo gerar imagens perfeitas para a minha necessidade mas gostaria que estivesse em resolução maior.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.