Skip to main content
Participant
June 29, 2023
Answered

561104166 has not really 3000 x 2143 px.

  • June 29, 2023
  • 2 replies
  • 328 views

561104166 has not really 3000 x 2143 px.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Contributor1

Thank you für routing this.
Such pictures are a nuisance in creative workflow.

 


Hello @default9pa82xjfmn7u, I've refunded your credit and sent the details of the image to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

2 replies

Participant
July 3, 2023

Thank you for the credit.
And more important: thank you for reviewing that.
Sometimes we propose pictures to our customers ... and later we have to explain, we can't use it. That's annoying.

 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 3, 2023

I agree completely with that. I know, however, that Adobe does check assets before they get added to the database. But with several hundred thousand new assets per week, there are always some slipping through.

 

The contributor has more than one hobbit hide.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 3, 2023

What is the resolution that the asset is showing at your side?

How did you check the resolution?

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Michael Steinle
Inspiring
July 3, 2023

🙂
Look at the picture with 100%.
It is interpolated from a much lower size.

 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 3, 2023

That's a different issue. But it is an issue that @Contributor1 could take care off.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer