Questions

Recently downloaded an asset from Adobe Stock (https://stock.adobe.com/uk/images/building-web-icons-in-line-style-hotel-hospital-apartament-city-town-house-mall-coffee-collection-vector-illustration/780136570?prev_url=detail) - this asset has clearly been created from a very poor quality image trace in Adobe Illustrator. These are also not editable strokes. I would imagine that all of the similar assets from this creator are the same.  Adobe needs a way of reporting slop like this. I would also like a credit refund for this rubbish. 

'm trying to download a video from Stock, but every time I hit the "download" button get the same warning: "This video cannot be licensed / You cannot license this video." I upgraded my account to unlimited membership, but nothing has changed. I restarted my computer, cleared my browsing history, and logged in again; same warning and there is no additional explanation about it. Same issue occurs with other videos, too. What am I missing?

Hello, for the past few months a lot of the vector assets i have downloaded are unueaseble for my professional work. They are clearly ai generated (or just VERY poor quality), but not flagged as such, so i can’t filter them out. Even in the preview i can’t spot this, but after downloading the paths are messy, everything is merged together, so i can’t edit them like i want. This feels like a huge waste of time. Sometimes it is so bad that i can’t even find a man made illustration for a certain general topic. As suggested many times there should be a report option for this. I contacted the support chat and they suggested i post the assets here, as i have a very long list i will just start with my most recent downloads.#1957485896#1968842490#1957487115#1971484829#1940463627#1660034431#1637673717#1939741038#1949048879

I see multiple posts asking the same question - but the answer is always "pm us" - there is *STILL* no mechanism for reporting offensive images. A clear link at the top of the relevant pages (forums, stock homepage etc), or next to each image is clearly needed.Whom do I pm to report the image I've seen? And no, just like others have pointed out, I'm not listing it for others to stumble across. Is Adobe Stock a soft porn site now?Searching for 'Kitchen counter" brings me to a related image of a girl clearly in her teens wearing nothing but boots and a top. The image is marked as 'provocative' - but is clearly far beyond that.This is offensive. Who is responsible for moderating submissions? Can we have a name?

I just came across an image (535300163) that has multiple conflicting keywords – alberta, british columbia, manitoba, lake ontario. It’s a photo of a neighborhood of houses, presumably in one of these very different places. So which province is it? It makes no sense. My search was for a specific city in Ontario.Is it the Submitting Photographer making bad choices with keywords? Is it a Reviewer doing a terrible job – whether human or (more likely) robot? The problem of bad search results has been persistent with Adobe Stock. I guess my question is (again), why is there such bad quality control, Adobe? Or perhaps my question should be… What has taken me so long to switch to a competitor for my stock needs? At this point, it’s clear you’re not going to fix your search results. But you are good at raising the subscription price!

There is no feature that allows us to report poor quality photos, or vector images that are poorly executed. There is no feature that allows us to report images that are clearly AI when they are not tagged as such. Furthermore, the search results are often ABYSMAL – and they have been for years. People have clearly asked for these features/improvements and Adobe has not provided what we need. Will you just continue raising your prices and giving us ever more AI without responding to our needs? Seriously.

I still cannot believe there is no reporting feature. Obviously this is done on purpose since users have been requesting it since the second AI image generation was launched. Proof: SynthID.https://stock.adobe.com/images/close-up-of-bristlenose-pleco-fish-on-gravel/1849161313As well as this user's ENTIRE database. It shows up for me despite explicitly excluding AI-generated assets. SMH

Io creo delle confezioni per diversi fornitori che utilizzano la medesima foto, il cliente a cui fatturo è lo stesso ma i fornitori a cui lui si rivolge sono diversi. Io capisco che devo comprare due licenze estese distinte su Adobe Stock, ma non riesco a farlo perchè ho già comprato una licenza estesa e la secoonda volta me la fa scaricare gratuitamente. Potete aiutarmi? Grazie.

I design horizontal banners and I need to preview them at the correct crop to decide whether or not to license an image. All of  sudden that is no longer possible. AI Studio is a poor substitute for this simple functionality.

Common issues that can affect the technical quality of an image include exposure problems, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts, and noise. I don't understand why it is being rejected due to these issues.

Hallo Zusammen,ich habe versehentlich ein Premiumbild gekauft und möchte es gerne zurückgeben bzw. stornieren. Gibt es aus Kulanzgründen die Möglichkeit einer Rückerstattung bzw. einer Stornierung?#1949067946Datum des Kaufs: 2026.04.16Vielen Dank

How do I report inappropriate images? Image #307044448 is really inappropriate, as well as the other images with those models are upsetting. I don't know any woman who would pose with a child like that in her underwear. 

I downloaded two different wallpapers https://stock.adobe.com/search/images?k=cash%2525252Bwallpaper&asset_id=126015203 and when I try to import them into Photoshop, they claim the app doesn't support the printing of banknotes. Then why offer them in Stock without at least a warning? This is super frustrating.

I am using adobe cc subcription and today face an issue with content that has been in adobe portfolio as vector once i download the asset to use in my project it show's in illustrator as raster based , how adobe review team check the asset before approval i have donwload 2 assets that are in ai, eps file format on adobe but once i opend it;s showing raster not a vector here is the link of both assets : https://stock.adobe.com/images/vibrant-red-dragon-soars-through-clouds-in-ancient-mythological/1849476189 https://stock.adobe.com/images/tree-roots-forming-heart-shape-symbolizing-love-and-nature-on-white-background/1885266642 

Unsere Credits sind am 01.01.2026 auf 0 gesetzt worden.01.01.24 - 01.04.26 = 28 Monate x 40 Credits angekauft = 1.120 CreditsIm Zeitraum vom 01.01.2024 bis 01.04.2026 wurden 708 Credits verbraucht.Aktuell werden nur 117 Credits angezeigt.Können die restlichen Credits mit Stand 31.12.2025 wiederhergestellt werden?Vielen Dank für die Unterstützung.

User: Александр Марченко Man piloting a drone : #1111212684Container ship loading and unloading in cargo port : #901177909Person using tablet in a green field: #831352677Geodesic dome glamping in the forest at dusk with lights on: #1018267969Aerial view of a nuclear power plant with cooling towers emitting steam: #854782645Cargo ship entering port at sunset: #831354624Worker observing wind turbines at sea: #8031356216Woman hitchhiking on a forest road: #831341428This is not even all of them. I just do not want to do unpaid work for Adobe.I also want to point out a major flaw in this process. When I uploaded previews of these images to the AI checkers linked by a community member in an outline for reporting mislabeled AI images, EVERY SINGLE ONE of them failed to recognize the images as AI. It was only after I downloaded the LICENSED IMAGES and uploaded them to the AI checker, which directly gives these creators compensation. I was able to identify every preview as AI EASILY, just by se

I once registered an account with Adobe Stock Contributor as a seller. But about a year ago, the company that operated this email service simply shut it down, and now I can't access my email. As a result, I can't use my account on other computers because I need to enter a verification code sent to my email. To add an additional email address, I have to enter this code again. Is there a way to resolve this issue? Is there a way to resolve the issue privately, providing all the necessary proof? Or is it possible to receive this verification code on my phone instead of by email?

absolutely atrocious ai art being pushed on my search despite opting out of it in my settings. the slop that is being put out there is so badly done its nearly laughable how they charge so much money for this service. i’ve seen art in preschools more sensical than this pile of lines

I'm getting a TON of rejections of what I think are pretty good AI generated images for "Quality Issues". I understand the ones that are "Similar in library" because how many of the same image do you need, but there's no reason for all of these to be getting hit with quality rejections.Do you agree?Here are a couple of examples:https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3zbif3btm4af08yvsj96y/001_colorful-plant-forward-lunch-bowls-on-natural-table.jpeg?rlkey=t7w9zimenhvsbrhj3jx0fd7md&dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/lt6imaqexu80w17z6pqdl/002_neatly-arranged-pantry-shelves-with-jars-baskets-and-staple-foods.jpeg?rlkey=4gvsp1v2l1gtubrgbv8yjivjb&dl=0

Please explain why I keep getting “Quality Issues” if I’m using your tools,  Firefly, Photoshop and Lightroom. It’s no fun if your programs don’t produce the QUALITY necessary  for Stock and commercial use. You need to EXPLAIN what and why my image is not accepted so in the future I can produce acceptable submissions. Otherwise what am I paying for? And going to the community for explanations is not really helpful. As they don’t have a clear answer. and you can’t upload the full sized file. You need much better feedback than just saying Quality Issues etc. 

Searching Adobe Stock is extremely frustrating! I shouldn’t have to spend HOURS looking for photos and images. I’m finding it really difficult to narrow down results in Adobe Stock when I’m looking for very specific compositions (like side angle, over-the-shoulder, or device-focused shots).Are there specific keywords or search strategies that actually help refine results? The filters are of little to no use. For example, if I exclude all people, 40% of the results still show people in them. Also, does Adobe Stock support any kind of Boolean operators or advanced search syntax (like using +, AND/OR, etc.) to make searches more precise?Any additional insight is greatly appreciated! TIA!

Belum tahu banyak tentang jualan foto dan illustrasi mohon bantuannya.

Acabo de cancelar un plan de prueba para Adobe Stocks. Como puedo asegurarme que recibiré el reembolso de dinero? Debo aclarar que he cancelado el plan antes de los 14 días establecidos, después de que me han cobrado por el servicio. Esperaría recibir ese reembolso lo más rápido posible, adjunto la imagen en la que aseguran que recibiré el reembolso 

I routinely find images that are clearly generated by AI image generators, but there is no indication in the description that they are. Generally it's missing fingers, or lighting or something else that gives it away, but my concern is that Adobe's team is not filtering all of these images well enough. I definitely see value in AI images, but I don't want to be downloading something that I think is a real image, when it is not. This is misleading at the least.    Example https://stock.adobe.com/images/santa-cooking/550542006?prev_url=detail