Questions

Ce post pour pousser un coup de gueule. Je suis graphiste depuis 25 ans et j'utilise Adobe Stock depuis au moins 20 ans. Depuis un an, je constate une nette dégradation des résultats de recherche et de la qualité des fichiers sur la plateforme.J’ai des remontés d’images qui n’ont aucun rapport avec les mots-clés saisies, des visuels bas de gamme en premier résultat de recherche malgré les filtres sélectionnés, c’est une perte de temps considérable car plus de temps pour trouver des images professionnelles de qualité exploitable.Vient ensuite le problème des visuels générés par IA. Dans 98% de mes recherches, je coche l'option « Exclure l'IA générative ». Malgré cela, les résultats restent pollués par des images créées par IA. Sur une image de type photo, je vois par la colorimétrie contraste que c’est de l’IA, mais pour un fichier vectoriel, c'est invisible : on  le découvre seulement à l'ouverture dans Illustrator. Résultat : des crédits perdus sans solution pour un remboursement. Auj

Dear Adobe Stock Review Team,I hope you are doing well.I recently had 09 of my CAD vector collections rejected with the reason "Intellectual Property Refusal." These are original CAD-style vector illustrations that I created myself, and I did not intentionally include any copyrighted, trademarked, or proprietary designs.Last year, I experienced a similar situation. After I contacted Adobe Stock Support, the affected assets were reviewed again, and the IP refusals were found to be incorrect. The assets were subsequently restored. Because of that previous experience, I would greatly appreciate it if this recent batch could also be reviewed once more.The rejected Asset IDs are:Asset ID: 2090712281Asset ID: 2090712180Asset ID: 2090712169Asset ID: 2090712067Asset ID: 2090712047Asset ID: 2090711981Asset ID: 2090711939Asset ID: 2090711896Asset ID: 2090711895If there is a specific element in these illustrations that caused the Intellectual Property concern, I would sincerely appreciate your gu

“Adobe removed names/IDs from Stock license history, making it impossible for admins to track who licenses assets. It’s not accessible or on the roadmap, though other stock houses provide it. Anyone else need this?”

I'd like to report an Adobe Stock files that is misleading/incorrect. I just licensed this file and downloaded the vector version of it, but the file is empty and produces an error that a linked file is missing: https://stock.adobe.com/images/broken-porcelain-teacup-with-floral-pattern-vector-illustration/1975787618?prev_url=detailCould not find the linked file"Whisk_18a7d20e551cdb28d364c512681ce628dr_traced.ai". ChooseReplace to select another file or Ignore to leave the link unchanged.Thank you

2082191679 & 2082190626 which appear under the vector filter and can be downloaded as AI files actually only open with an embedded image. 

Exmo/a Senhor/a, O meu plano falhou o pagamento, a página está bloqueada e eu quero cancelar imediatamente. Não pretendo pagar a mensalidade falhada pois já não uso o serviço. Como posso cancelar sem pagar? Obrigada!

ich habe viele tolle Bilder hochgeladen. Verschiedene aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen. Hochauflösend und sehr individuell. Ich bin mir sicher, dass es Leute gibt, die da eines haben wollen. Aber alle wurden abgelehnt. Es gibt wenig Infos bzw Beispiele, wie die Bilder aussehen sollten. 

Adobe Stock search is completely unusable.Every search (e.g. "Scotland", "Nature", "London") briefly displays "Page not found" before automatically redirecting to the Adobe Stock homepage.We have reproduced this:multiple Adobe accounts multiple users multiple Macs/PCs Safari, Chrome and Edge logged in and logged out BelgiumDirect URLs such as https://stock.adobe.com/search/images?k=scotland also fail.Safari Web Inspector reports:"Failed to load resource: Redirect was not allowed" "Unhandled Promise Rejection: TypeError: Load failed"This appears to be a server-side routing or redirect issue rather than a client problem.Anyone know what is going on? Support closed my request without answering..  

Are the AI generated images being reviewed for body parts looking phallic before being approved?ID 940767555  The thumb of the hand holding the pen. Looks phallic. The image is in the “business” categoory 

I PAID FOR and downloaded a YouTube subscribe video (AdobeStock_1497327233.mov) that featured a transparent background, but now the file on my hard drive is no longer able to import to my video projects even though the file shows in my internal, offline Finder searches. ??? I went to the AdobeStock website and found the file in my download history, but it will not download, saying it’s no longer available. ???  Is this to say Adobe hobbled my file so that I cannot use it anymore??? 

I still cannot believe there is no reporting feature. Obviously this is done on purpose since users have been requesting it since the second AI image generation was launched. Proof: SynthID.https://stock.adobe.com/images/close-up-of-bristlenose-pleco-fish-on-gravel/1849161313As well as this user's ENTIRE database. It shows up for me despite explicitly excluding AI-generated assets. SMH

Checking back in as the human report button since one STILL does not exist for the everlasting problem of reporting unlabeled AI Assets. I have found 3 accounts that are all posting isolated .pngs. I am not saying 100% of their unmarked assets are AI, but 100% of the ones that I have checked (10+ on each account) all have come back as AI images, which I suspected initially. Animals are still obvious. Everything is in this weird uncanny valley blend of 3D/CGI + Photorealism. If necessary I can link the individual assets that are unmarked AI but I highly recommend just taking a look at these accounts.. ​@Contributor1  I do not have all day to do what could be someone’s actual job. Or the job of a simple button.  Edit: Added 4 more accounts for a total of 7… I am starting to pick up that there may be a pattern in the simple account names and what they upload. There is a large amount of overlapping material (golden retrievers, hot dogs, pigs, etc.) I have seen a couple images that are bord

I accidentally clicked on "download" on a premium image while inspecting my search results. Can someone help me refund this? I have already deleted the file, and it has not and will not be used in any project. I reached out to support but they could only offer 5 credits, and i was deducted 60x credits for an image i will never use. Thank you!! 

Since nothing was done the last time I reported these and they still show up in search results with AI turned OFF, here they are again with new additions. What are you doing, Adobe? Where is the Report AI button? Are the small profits made off this really worth poisoning the entire database? I'm talking about these users’ ENTIRE galleries, not just the examples. They all have similar usernames and unmarked completely AI-generated galleries. Would almost think y’all planted these yourselves.https://stock.adobe.com/es/contributor/213177879/rowenaExample: https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/isolated-royal-gramma-fairy-basslet-colorful-marine-fish-swimming-alone-in-the-ocean/1927714257 Doesn’t exist.https://stock.adobe.com/es/contributor/211372845/mehranExample: https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/a-close-up-shot-of-a-royal-gramma-fish-showcasing-its-stunning-and-vivid-coloration-in/684257037 Didn’t even TRY to make it look like something that exists.https://stock.adobe.com/es/contributor/2131

Hi everyone, I’ve been an Adobe Stock user for years, mainly downloading high‑quality, professionally produced vector illustrations. Recently, though, I’ve started noticing a growing number of extremely complex vector files that are clearly AI‑generated images auto‑traced in Illustrator. These files look fine at first glance, but once you open them, they’re filled with thousands of unnecessary points, messy paths, and chaotic structures that make them nearly impossible to edit, customize, or even work with efficiently. What used to be clean, intentional vector artwork is now being replaced with AI‑generated “sloppy vectors,” and it’s becoming a serious issue for those of us who rely on Stock for production‑ready assets. This isn’t just about aesthetics, it's a workflow problem. These vectors are a lot, disorganized, and not suitable for professional use. I think it’s important for Adobe to look more closely at the quality control of vector submissions, especially with AI

These two artistshttps://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/212291746/sweet?load_type=author&prev_url=detailhttps://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/213256553/forhad?load_type=author&prev_url=detailhave many assets on adobe stock that are tagged as vector and are in fact raster images.I have downloaded only a couple from each, but it seems most of their images that are sold as vector are actually raster.

There are images that are misleading / inaccurate in what the content is (example: Betsy Ross 13 star circle, but it only has 12 stars), or AI images with inaccuracies (example: American flag with 38 stars). Is there a good way to report these issues, or have warnings that there may be inaccuracies in either design or the description? (I mean, its fine if you really want “1776” surrounded by 12 stars.. but don’t mark it as 13.)

I need to provide proof that AD5BW5.jpg was licensed from Adobe Stock in 2020. We only include images on our website that are licensed from Adobe Stock. Could you confirm that an image with prefix AD will have been licensed from Adobe Stock?

I licensed two powerpoint slide templates.  I thought I was just saving content like I do in Adobe Express but the term “licensed” popped up in blue and I am worried I purchased something through my agency, and I do not have permission to do so.  I was hoping to look at the templates in Powerpoint, so I clicked download--I was not aware that this would license an asset to my agency and wish to undo this.

Hello Adobe Stock Team,For about six months, I have not been able to submit any photos to Adobe Stock.I understand that some of my earlier submissions were rejected, but many of my photos were also accepted. However, since then, my account has not allowed me to submit any new content, and I have not received any explanation for this issue.I believe six months is an unusually long time to be unable to upload new submissions, especially considering that only some of my previous files were rejected.Could you please review my account and let me know why I am unable to submit photos? I would appreciate any information or assistance you can provide.Contributor ID: 213094155Thank you for your time and support.Kind regards,Adi

Hi,I've licensed an image but have realised I actually need the larger resolution file.Would it be possible to cancel or credit my original licence so I can purchase the larger version instead? If there's an upgrade option, I'd be happy to do that.Thanks!R

I found this image while looking for stock images and I would like to report it. Discretion is advised#382334403

i have licensed https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/212821033/NaheeD?asset_id=1918783306very bad and auto trace , looks ai garbage , please check the asset and i need my credits back ​@Contributor1