Is this the new norm?

Can I ask is this strict reject 90% of AI uploads going to be the new norm?

I mean can they at least have a new rejection flag instead of quality issue, already in our collection and just Say it as it is "Rejected because it's AI only"

I mean, the fact that you then get an email saying we rejected everything (because its AI) please submit more work, is a pretty big insult. I am sure some people do upload bad quality work, but I mean the 3 or 4 that did get accepted are made in the same way as the 70+ rejected, so if an image of a flower has malformed fingers OK :-P, but if they are made in the same engine, same resolution, same pro enlarger why is the one selected and the mass rejected? Is it AI scanned? Are people scanning these? 
Is there a big list of items that can be submitted that ARE NOT in the collection that gives AI makers a better chance of avoiding this 90% auto rejection policy in place, and finally. Wil this be reviewed and ammended? or is this the new way forward. Adobe can freely offer AI services in their products, online servies, etc but of someone wants to seel that AI the sorry!! Seems a little hypocritical to me in a free market America.