Inspiring

Question

Reporting more mislabeled AI Assets

Forum|Forum|4 days ago
May 18, 2026
4 replies
50 views

I am back again as Adobe unpaid workhorse to mass report mislabeled AI assets since they still have not added this as a feature after years of people asking for it.

I did not AI check a single image. I did not need to, it was obvious. How these assets are getting by Adobe’s approval process is beyond me. It seems like most often, there are collections of 20-30 AI images and 2-3 slip through as undetected. To me, that implies a flaw on Adobe’s part, but it could always be contributors working to circumvent the system.

Contributor: maxximmm

1979754300 (reported as 60% AI. there are a small handful of videos that seem quite “off” but to test them I would have to spend $80 to license them...)

There are definitely more but I do not have the time nor the patience to scroll through 100+ pages of content. That should be Adobe’s job…

Side note, thank you to @Contributor1 who seems to be the only hope at getting mislabeled assets taken down.

C

Contributor1

Community Manager

Hello @graphics_4075, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the assets.

Jill_C

Community Expert

Most of these are quite old (which is no excuse, but perhaps Adobe has gotten better at screening out mis-labeled AI). My most recent submissions have an asset number that starts with 19 (1.9 billion), which means that the ones that you reported that start with 12 are quite old.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

graphics_4075Author

Inspiring

Thank you for letting me know. I agree it isn’t an excuse, but also good to know in terms gauging the functionality of their AI screening and how it may have improved.

I think knowing this, I still question why these assets are displayed very high up in a search, out of thousands of results that were likely uploaded more recently.

Jill_C

Community Expert

If they had even one sale, they’re boosted above other assets that meet the keyword search but have never been sold - unless the Buyer utilizes the “undiscovered content” filter.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

graphics_4075Author

Inspiring

Searched “Hydroelectric”

This one is the 6th top result… ridiculous: 1156947723

also on the front page of results: 740273559

Some incredibly low-quality AI. Almost looks like 2020 Midjourney. No idea how these are untagged.

Community Expert

These are really old assets, perhaps from the first year that AI submissions were allowed. The asset number is the clue - starting with 560 (million). My more recent submissions start with 19 (1.9 billion). It would be nice if Adobe found a way to programmatically / systematically get rid of some of this kind of “ai slop” from the database...

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

graphics_4075Author

Inspiring

It took me a total of 30 seconds to find this account by searching “industry” under images/photos (excluding gen-AI of course). It is just too easy lol

If you have found an account with multiple mislabeled assets, add this to the end of their user URL to exclude Gen-AI and find unmarked assets easier

&filters[gentech]=exclude

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded