Yet again reporting unlabeled AI assets

Forum|Forum|2 months ago
April 17, 2026
6 replies
91 views

I still cannot believe there is no reporting feature. Obviously this is done on purpose since users have been requesting it since the second AI image generation was launched. Proof: SynthID.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/close-up-of-bristlenose-pleco-fish-on-gravel/1849161313

As well as this user's ENTIRE database. It shows up for me despite explicitly excluding AI-generated assets. SMH

C

Contributor1

Community Manager

Hello @granaatappelsap, I've sent the details of your report to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the asset.

For a refund/credit return please reach out to our customer care team below:

Adobe customer care can be contacted by beginning a secure chat session at https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html?rghtup=autoOpen. Pop-up blockers need to be disabled! If the chat window fails to open, or is non-responsive, use a different device to start the interaction. Also, if you don’t see the chat feature you may need to accept all adobe cookies.

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

@Contributor1

Can you take a look at these?

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

granaatappelsapAuthor

Participating Frequently

Here is another entire database of fake images, multiple of which have shown up in search results with non-AI only selected.

https://stock.adobe.com/es/contributor/213177879/rowena

Example: https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/isolated-royal-gramma-fairy-basslet-colorful-marine-fish-swimming-alone-in-the-ocean/1927714257

I also see absolutely nothing was done about the “Major” account flagged previously. Their entire gallery is comprised of misleading AI images. Here is another one: https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/royal-gramma-gramma-loreto-isolated-on-white-background-tropical-marine-saltwater-ornamental-coral-reef-aquarium-fish-purple-yellow-reef-species-vibrant-reef-tank-cutout-image/1922175142

Then there’s this: https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/a-close-up-shot-of-a-royal-gramma-fish-showcasing-its-stunning-and-vivid-coloration-in/684257073

https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/a-close-up-shot-of-a-royal-gramma-fish-showcasing-its-stunning-and-vivid-coloration-in/684257037

I should send an invoice for the moderating work I'm doing here tbh

graphics_4075

Inspiring

If I got paid $1 for every mislabeled AI asset I could find, I would bankrupt Adobe within a week.

How is routing users to a forum not browsed by employees to report assets easier than a BUTTON that sends them straight to the team? Incomprehensible levels of negligence and laxity

Cheers

granaatappelsapAuthor

Participating Frequently

It has to be on purpose because they're making money off these. They already told me they’d “look into” some of these assets and they're still up a few months later, so I have no idea why I’m reporting them but here we are

granaatappelsapAuthor

Participating Frequently

https://stock.adobe.com/images/a-side-view-of-a-spiky-pufferfish-with-its-mouth-slightly-open-and-eyes-looking-forward-isolated-on-a-transparent-background/1769861463

Another completely AI profile that comes up despite excluding AI and specifically selecting “Photos". I pay for this service, why do I have to moderate it myself? Entire gallery just slop, slop, slop.