Skip to main content
granaatappelsap
Participating Frequently
Apr 17, 2026 1:51 PM UTC
Question

Yet again reporting unlabeled AI assets

I still cannot believe there is no reporting feature. Obviously this is done on purpose since users have been requesting it since the second AI image generation was launched. Proof: SynthID.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/close-up-of-bristlenose-pleco-fish-on-gravel/1849161313

As well as this user's ENTIRE database. It shows up for me despite explicitly excluding AI-generated assets. SMH

    10 replies

    Community Manager
    Jul 8, 2026 12:50 AM UTC

    Hello ​@granaatappelsap, I've sent the details of your report to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the asset.

     

    For a refund/credit return please reach out to our customer care team below:
     

    Adobe customer care can be contacted by beginning a secure chat session at https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html?rghtup=autoOpen. Pop-up blockers need to be disabled! If the chat window fails to open, or is non-responsive, use a different device to start the interaction. Also, if you don’t see the chat feature you may need to accept all adobe cookies.

    Translate
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    Jul 7, 2026 10:24 PM UTC

    ​@Contributor1 

    Can you take a look at these?

     

    Translate
    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    granaatappelsap
    Participating Frequently
    Jun 28, 2026 4:16 PM UTC
    graphics_4075
    Inspiring
    Jul 7, 2026 9:53 PM UTC

    If I got paid $1 for every mislabeled AI asset I could find, I would bankrupt Adobe within a week.

    How is routing users to a forum not browsed by employees to report assets easier than a BUTTON that sends them straight to the team? Incomprehensible levels of negligence and laxity

    Translate
    Cheers
    granaatappelsap
    Participating Frequently
    Jul 8, 2026 9:25 AM UTC

    It has to be on purpose because they're making money off these. They already told me they’d “look into” some of these assets and they're still up a few months later, so I have no idea why I’m reporting them but here we are

    Translate
    granaatappelsap
    Participating Frequently
    Apr 27, 2026 3:44 PM UTC

    https://stock.adobe.com/images/a-side-view-of-a-spiky-pufferfish-with-its-mouth-slightly-open-and-eyes-looking-forward-isolated-on-a-transparent-background/1769861463

    Another completely AI profile that comes up despite excluding AI and specifically selecting “Photos". I pay for this service, why do I have to moderate it myself? Entire gallery just slop, slop, slop.

    Translate
    granaatappelsap
    Participating Frequently
    Apr 25, 2026 1:15 PM UTC

    Here is another one. I also suspect most of this contributor's gallery is AI. No synthID but the coral banded shrimp does NOT look like this and this shrimp does NOT exist at all. The AI has mixed up multiple shrimp species to create this. https://stock.adobe.com/images/coral-banded-shrimp-stenopus-hispidus-isolated-on-white-background-banded-cleaner-shrimp-tropical-marine-saltwater-aquarium-coral-reef-species-cutout-image/1922165621?
     

    Translate
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    Apr 17, 2026 8:14 PM UTC

    SightEngine Confirmed:  https://sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images

    GenAI 95%,

    Imagen/Nano Banana 90%

    File ID#1849161313 should be labeled as Generative AI

     

    Translate
    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    granaatappelsap
    Participating Frequently
    Apr 25, 2026 1:09 PM UTC

    And the entire rest of this user's database. Every. Single. One. Is. Fake.

    Translate