Skip to main content
Participant
Jan 25, 2017 11:16 PM UTC
Answered

Legality of Images (not signature)

I have a stack of documents signed with signatures with the blue line underneath, but two are signed with small personal pictures. How legal are the pictures versus a signature or picture of a signature?

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.
AadeshSingh
AadeshSinghCorrect answer
Participating Frequently
Jan 28, 2017 11:06 AM UTC

Hi ryanb27105057

It's not about legality of Image based signature, it's about legality of Adobe Sign for which you can refer to the Adobe Sign FAQ Adobe Sign FAQs

Because, image based signature in Adobe Sign is also part of electronic signature service.

Regards,

Aadesh

2 replies

AadeshSingh
AadeshSinghCorrect answer
Participating Frequently
Jan 28, 2017 11:06 AM UTC

Hi ryanb27105057

It's not about legality of Image based signature, it's about legality of Adobe Sign for which you can refer to the Adobe Sign FAQ Adobe Sign FAQs

Because, image based signature in Adobe Sign is also part of electronic signature service.

Regards,

Aadesh

Translate
MichaelKazlow
Legend
Jan 27, 2017 12:38 AM UTC

An X on a written page is considered legal signature. The real question is not the legality but who will accept it and if you can document that it was 'signed' by who you said it was signed by. My bank won't accept e-signatures. End of story. They won't accept Powers of attorney that wasn't on their forms, signed in front of them. Neither will my stock broker, but they accept faxed documents. Go figure.

Translate