A question regarding non-compliance rejection using 3D and AI.
Good day.
I have 1 image rejected today for non compliance.
Possible reasons:
- Non compliant use of another artist’s name.
- Undeclared Generative AI Content.
- Content not compliant with overall guidelines:
I created and rendered an image using blender 3D. I usually just set the size to 6k or 8k, make some adjustments and then submit it for review. This would normally take 8-18 hrs or more for 1 image with the current PC I'm using depending on the complexity. So I tried cutting the image render size in half to save some time and just upscale the rendered image (resize using AI). Below is the test image I submitted for review and it was rejected for the above possible reasons:
My question is, for my next submission if I plan to resize another image, should I title and tag it as 3D rendered or just go straight with AI Generated Content with no mention of "3D rendered" to avoid rejection? Maybe the reason is something else under the third one, but it's not a Quality issue.
- Image Submitted For Review

- Image Created in Blender

- File Edited with Blending Options and Vibrance

- Rendered from Blender Reduced Size

- Upscaled Image using AI Reduced Size

