Skip to main content
oregano
Participating Frequently
November 11, 2023
Answered

A question regarding non-compliance rejection using 3D and AI.

  • November 11, 2023
  • 1 reply
  • 591 views

Good day.

I have 1 image rejected today for non compliance.

Possible reasons:

- Non compliant use of another artist’s name.

- Undeclared Generative AI Content.

- Content not compliant with overall guidelines:

 

I created and rendered an image using blender 3D. I usually just set the size to 6k or 8k, make some adjustments and then submit it for review. This would normally take 8-18 hrs or more for 1 image with the current PC I'm using depending on the complexity.  So I tried cutting the image render size in half to save some time and just upscale the rendered image (resize using  AI). Below is the test image I submitted for review and it was rejected for the above possible reasons:

 

My question is, for my next submission if I plan to resize another image, should I title and tag it as 3D rendered or just go straight with AI Generated Content with no mention of "3D rendered" to avoid rejection? Maybe the reason is something else under the third one, but it's not a Quality issue.

 

  • Image Submitted For Review

 

  • Image Created in Blender
  • File Edited with Blending Options and Vibrance

 

  • Rendered from Blender Reduced Size

 

  • Upscaled Image using AI Reduced Size
This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

No.


You could try to resubmit with changes in the title and keywords. For any 3D render, I would add 3D render as an info in the title and the keywords. Do not mention Blender. Don't mention resizing, neither, and resizing is not part of the generative AI.

 

But yes, if you can afford, do a 3D render at size because the resulting quality will be better. Resizing is not a non-conforming image refusal. It's a quality issue refusal if there are quality issues.

1 reply

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 11, 2023

Noncompliance is not a quality related refusal. The moderator may have misunderstood the asset as a generative AI asset. Or it was placed in the reminder tab and you resubmitted without addressing the issue.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
oregano
oreganoAuthor
Participating Frequently
November 11, 2023

That's what I thought too, maybe the moderator sees it as an AI asset, as I submit pure AI assets too. It was in "review" tab then went to "not accepted". This is the first image I submitted that is not generated by AI but is resized by AI, to check if it gets accepted and hopefully save a lot of time rendering images. In any case AI is involved, so I'm now a bit hesitant to submit upscaled images that are created in blender without a checkmark on Created using AI...

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 11, 2023
quote

It was in "review" tab then went to "not accepted".


By @oregano

Did you resubmit?

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer