Skip to main content
Nov 28, 2025 11:33 AM UTC
Answered

According to Adobe, the NanoBana 2 Pro produces images of unacceptable quality.

According to Adobe, the NanoBana 2 Pro produces images of unacceptable quality.
What do you think about that?

Nancy OShea
Nancy OSheaCorrect answer
Community Expert
Nov 28, 2025 9:15 PM UTC

Adobe never said anything about 3rd party NanoBanana 2.

 

  1. Stock reviews all assets for sales potential. 
  2. When assets meet acceptance standards, they're accepted into inventory. When they don't, they're rejected. Simple, simple.
  3. This has nothing to do with which tools Contributors decide to use.

 

Read your Contributor User Guide for more details.

Hope that helps.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

5 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
Nov 28, 2025 9:15 PM UTC

Adobe never said anything about 3rd party NanoBanana 2.

 

  1. Stock reviews all assets for sales potential. 
  2. When assets meet acceptance standards, they're accepted into inventory. When they don't, they're rejected. Simple, simple.
  3. This has nothing to do with which tools Contributors decide to use.

 

Read your Contributor User Guide for more details.

Hope that helps.

 

Translate
Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
Nov 28, 2025 7:10 PM UTC

No particular AI software, even those designed by Adobe, is a guarantee of acceptance by Adobe Stock. All AI generators make mistakes, and it's your job to detect those and either regenerate the asset, edit it or reject it.

Translate
Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Known Participant
Nov 28, 2025 11:45 AM UTC

Seems a bit unusual since it is an option in Photoshop Generative AI

Translate
Nov 28, 2025 11:49 AM UTC

Just one upload bulk fully accepted, second - fully rejected. Thats adobe ))

Translate
Nov 28, 2025 11:34 AM UTC

I think adobe just randomly accept or reject images

Translate