AI-images

Question

I tried a few months ago with some AI images, some of which were accepted and several rejected (after months of waiting). Since then the AI reviewers have gotten even better - in fact really good. I've been working on some images since, because I felt that we 'old fashioned' photographers were being run over and I really don't like the concept. But that's how it has become, and Adobe apparently makes good use (money) of it. But there is REALLY a lot of work with the AI images. One can endlessly keep correcting, subtracting and adding. How people can generate hundreds - or thousands - of images at a time is a big mystery to me. It seems superhuman.

Jill_C · Answer

Those who are generating hundreds or thousands at a time are concentrating on quantity rather than quality and have probably decided that they can tolerate a high reject rate. Adobe has implemented changes in their upload, submission and review system to disincentivize this type of behaviour. Meanwhile, enterprising Contributors are figuring out how to automate more of the steps including such as using ChatGPT to generate titles and keywords. There are now 29.6 million AI assets in the database (nearly 8% of the total database), and today they announced that AI Vectors and AI Videos are allowed. So the flood of content will continue, and Adobe will continue to play whack-a-mole with the scammers and cheaters who violate the guidelines...

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded