Skip to main content
Participant
October 16, 2026
Question

Appeal: 118 Complete Periodic Table 3D Video Collection Declined as Repetitive

Hello Adobe Stock Community and Moderation Team,

I am writing to seek guidance and kindly request a manual re-examination of my recently rejected video submissions (the turning point being File ID: 2222458337 - 66 Dysprosium.mp4 and the related subsequent uploads), which were declined under the reason "Similar Content / Repetitive".

I completely understand and respect Adobe Stock's strict guidelines against spamming and repetitive templates. However, I believe there is a misunderstanding regarding the commercial and educational intent of this specific project:

1. Complete 118 Element Set: This is a meticulously designed, comprehensive educational collection consisting of all 118 elements of the Periodic Table. By scientific nature, a periodic table requires absolute consistency in design, composition, color, and animation speed. If the elements were designed with different aesthetics or variations, the cohesive "set value" would be completely ruined for high-end educational editors, textbooks, and scientific documentaries.

2. Customer Demand & Continuity: Customers who purchase these clips look for identical layouts so they can seamlessly transition from one chemical element to another (e.g., Hydrogen to Helium to Lithium) on their video timelines. Missing pieces or sudden design variations break the continuity of their academic work. A fragmented periodic table has no commercial value for buyers; they need the full, uniform set.

3. Unique Textures and Metadata: Although the gold-framed cube template remains visually uniform for scientific continuity, every single asset contains completely unique atomic numbers, chemical symbols, weights, and distinct metadata/tags tailored to that specific element.

Since this is a structured, complete 118-clip encyclopedic series rather than independent repetitive loops, I kindly ask an Adobe Stock moderator or staff member to review this case manually. 

Thank you very much for your understanding, time, and continuous support.

Best regards,
Tuncay Celik

    3 replies

    yamato713108855
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    October 17, 2026

    Staff members do not review or respond to threads posted in the community.
    If you wish to contest the rejection of an asset, please use the contact form located at the bottom of the contributor page.

    Translate
    Participant
    October 17, 2026

    Thank you for your response. However, I am posting here because the Adobe Virtual Assistant on the contributor support page repeatedly refuses to connect me with a human support agent, stating that I do not have an active paid subscription (which is normal for free Contributor accounts). 

    Since the automated system locked me out from reaching an actual agent through the official contact form, the community forum is my only available channel to raise this issue. 

    This is a complete, scientifically structured 118-clip educational series, and having it rejected as "repetitive" completely ruins the commercial value of the entire set for buyers. I kindly hope a Community Manager or Adobe Staff member can see this thread and forward it to the senior moderation team for a manual review. Thank you for your understanding.
     

    Translate
    yamato713108855
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    October 17, 2026

    There is no way to contact the reviewers directly.
    The only way to file an appeal is by using the inquiry form.
    If the outcome remains unchanged even after using the inquiry form, please look for a different theme.
    I hope for a positive outcome.

    Translate