Participant

Answered

can anyone say why those photos where rejected

7 replies
331 views
Translate

Contributor critique

Ricky336Correct answer

Community Expert

Perhaps composition is one thing to consider...

cutting off the feet.

White balance and composition. Maybe a narrower view?

composition:

Abambo

Community Expert

For the surfer at least, you also have chromatic aberration:

As for the rest, you should post here your originally submitted assets, not downsampled assets. A lot of the issues can't be checked in downsampled assets.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Ricky336

Correct answer

Community Expert

Perhaps composition is one thing to consider...

cutting off the feet.

White balance and composition. Maybe a narrower view?

composition:

Translate

E

erik@@@

Participating Frequently

Credo che la foto di ognuno di noi sia soggettiva...quindi non deve essere additata da altri, pwerchè quel tipo di fotografia potrebbe essere valida per un ipotetico acquirente!

Translate

Abambo

Community Expert

I think everyone's photo is subjective...so it should not be pointed out by others, because that kind of photo might be valid for a hypothetical buyer!

By @erik@@@

Well, cutting of the feet is not subjective, that is real. And there are indeed composition rules that you should know and follow. If you check the Adobe contributor instructions, you see that composition is part of the quality issues, as is the white balance.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Jill_C

Community Expert

The first image is a bit underexposed, and you would have needed to submit a model release for the surfer.

Translate

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.