Skip to main content
Participant
May 1, 2025
Question

change in criteria for quality?

  • May 1, 2025
  • 4 replies
  • 367 views

Hello,

 

I'm wondering if anyone knows if there has been a change in criteria for image quality recently? I've been contributing to Adobe Stock for a couple of years now and used to rarely get images rejected due to quality issues. Lately, MANY of my photos are being rejected for this reason. I have not changed cameras, lenses, or editing techniques. I would post some examples here, but there are so many that I don't think that's going to be helpful (to scrutinize on a photo by photo basis). Any thoughts?

 

TIA for your ideas or information. 

4 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025

The bar for acceptance is constantly rising.

  • Better equipment & software
  • More Generative AI options
  • New talent is joining Stock
  • There's stiffer competition for shelf-space, especially in over-represented keywords like sunsets, clouds & flowers.

 

Without seeing 1 or 2 examples, we can't be more specific. 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025

Personally, I think it is a good thing. In my view a lot of photos were passed and they shouldn't have been. Quality, subject matter, composition. What was then is not now. 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025

I've certainly seen more contributors asking for feedback here than usual lately. Some are obvious as to why, others not so much. Then again, like some people have trouble judging color, I have trouble seeing noise or artifacts unless someone points them out first, so I don't comment on those very often.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025
quote

I've certainly seen more contributors asking for feedback here than usual lately.


By @daniellei4510

But very few of those rejections were without obvious reasons. Most of them have multiple issues.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025

Exactly. That's why I brought up my noise/artifacts blindness. 🙂 Some looked OK to me until someone pointed those issue out. And it probably doesn't help that I've been on my old laptop more than usual lately, where it's even more difficult to notice the details.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025

Though Adobe has not announced any changes in reviewing practices, many Contributors have reported here and in the Discord server a dramatically increased rate of quality rejections. For many years I've been able to count on a <5% rejection rate, however in the last few months it has ballooned to ~40%. Unfortunately, there's nothing we can do about it, except keep uploading and hope for the best, or stop uploading, which is what I'm doing right now.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Participant
May 1, 2025

Thank you! I'm glad (but also not) to hear that others are having the same issue...I was really wondering if I was doing something wrong/different but I figured it couldn't be a camera setting/editing technique change/etc as there were images accepted next to ones rejected taken within seconds of each other. Guess I'll just keep trying and hope more go through than don't (although what a waste of time!)

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 1, 2025
quote

(...) but I figured it couldn't be a camera setting/editing technique change/etc as there were images accepted next to ones rejected taken within seconds of each other.


By @Julie29873779xd20

Unrelated. One picture can be good, the other one can be bad.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer