Skip to main content
January 4, 2026
Question

Choosing Asset Type for AI Images on Adobe Stock: Photo vs Illustration for Borderline Photorealisti

  • January 4, 2026
  • 5 replies
  • 238 views

Hello everyone,

I’m still a bit confused about choosing the correct asset type when submitting generative AI images to Adobe Stock.

In my opinion, many AI-generated images (such as living room interiors, furniture, or real-world objects) look realistic at first glance, but upon closer inspection, there are often subtle AI artifacts - for example in lighting, textures, or overall visual quality - that may not fully match high-quality camera photography.

Because of this, I’ve been consistently submitting these AI images as Illustrations, even when the subject itself is real and appears photorealistic. My reasoning is that choosing “Illustration” feels safer, since I’m unsure whether the image truly qualifies as “looks like it was captured with a camera.”

 

My questions are:

 

Is this approach incorrect or against Adobe Stock policy?

 

Or should AI images that look realistic still be submitted as Photos, even if there is a slight AI look upon closer inspection?

 

I’d really appreciate insights on best practices from experienced contributors regarding borderline photorealistic AI content.

 

Thank you in advance.

5 replies

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 5, 2026

Whether illustrations or photograph is selected, they will, or at least should, be rejected for quality issues. Moderators review images at 100% and even 200%, so a good moderator will not miss such details.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 5, 2026

What is a slight AI look under close inspection? That sounds like generative AI defects!

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 4, 2026

I can't add much to what @RALPH_L  and @daniellei4510 said already.  Except that AI artifacts are undesirable and should be corrected or removed prior to submission. 

 

  • Carefully examine every quadrant of content at 100-300% magnification.
  • Fix all errors if you can, or discard it & start over. 

It requires a lot of talent & skill to turn machine-generated content into commercially successful artwork. It's great if you have the patience for it. 😁  But it's not so great if you don't. 😝

 

Good luck.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 4, 2026

Here are some examples:

 

Screenshot 2024-02-04 at 12.23.50 PM.png

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 4, 2026

Adobe’s current guidelines suggest that if an image is intended to mimic a real-world photograph, it should be submitted as Photo. If it is intended to look like art, a drawing, or a CGI render, it should be Illustration.

When to choose "Photo"

Even if there are slight artifacts, you should choose Photo if:

  • The subject is a real-world object (living room, dog, landscape).

  • The lighting, depth of field (bokeh), and textures are designed to look like they came from a lens.

  • The logic: Buyers searching for "Modern Living Room" usually filter by "Photos." If your realistic-looking room is hidden in "Illustrations," it won't reach the target audience.

When to choose "Illustration"

You should stick with Illustration if:

  • The image has a "painterly" or "digital art" feel.

  • The proportions are intentionally surreal or stylized.

  • It looks like a 3D render (CGI) rather than a captured moment.


The AI Label: Since you must check the "Created using generative AI tools" box anyway, the buyer is already warned that the image isn't a traditional photograph. This "AI" tag is your primary legal and ethical safety net, not the Asset Type.