Known Participant

Answered

Comments on Rejected Photos

6 replies
738 views
Translate

Fellow contributors I am soliciting your comments on couple of the photos of mine that got rejected.

Contributor critique

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

Jill_CCorrect answer

Community Expert

The insect is quite beautiful, but the unfocused branch directly in front of it is distracting and overexposed and there is chromatic aberration nearby.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Did you post this image bacause it was rejected? This forum is not the place to showcase your work.

Translate

Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.

Abambo

Community Expert

😉 You did wake up an old post. I will lock it now.

(It may be, however, that you didn't want to respond to this message, or that the message you were responding to got removed…)

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

jacquelingphoto2017

Community Expert

Hi @DhandaNot ,

None of the photos is completely in focus. As was said, the snake is underexposed.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

Translate

Jill_C

Correct answer

Community Expert

The insect is quite beautiful, but the unfocused branch directly in front of it is distracting and overexposed and there is chromatic aberration nearby.

Translate

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

Snake: is underexposed:

You can't have structure and out of focus areas on the same plane. There is kind of noise in the eyes:

Dragon-fly: Flat histogram

Artefacts, due to sharpening.

I suppose, you did not submit with your watermark.

Great pictures btw, unfortunately the technical errors are present.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.