Contributor Critics, please evaluate my illustration rejections

Question

I assumed them being software generated illustrations that a 'quality rejection' would not be referenced, almost as if it's being considered an out of focus photograph?  Any criticism or suggestions will be greatly appreciated, for I am obviously having a problem processing and submitting digital art. Thanks in advance >buzz

Abambo · Accepted Answer

Why shouldn't quality issues not be part of illustration rejections? You need to read the manuals. There are a bunch of things that you can get wrong with vector graphics.

Your illustrations look like bad photographs, where you applied some kind of fancy filter and then did a bad job cutting out the bee and flower.

This is probably not the kind of art that Adobe stock looks at. I'm sorry, but even if the cutout job had been perfect, this would have earned a refusal.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ssrbuzz · Answer

I believe I've discovered my problem and the issue involves file format, whereas submitting as a .png (which can have quality issues) as opposed to vector based files, this is where I messed up. Should have done more research before posting, sorry for wasting space

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.