Contributor critique - "quality issues"

It's always difficult to second guess the moderators on the reasons they rejected an abstract asset. Maybe some personal bias is slipping in. Maybe. The first thing I noticed that may have been of concern to the moderator was that the clock on the tower could be just a tad more detailed so that the numbers were more discernible. No so highly detailed as to stand out against the rest of the image, but just enough so that one's imagination could see that there were numbers there.