I have an idea why this picture wasn't accepted. Unfortunately, your focus isn't good. There is slight camera movement - I guess the tripod wasn't sturdy enough, or something like that.
The photo is also slightly underexposed, as shown by the histogram.
I have an idea why this picture wasn't accepted. Unfortunately, your focus isn't good. There is slight camera movement - I guess the tripod wasn't sturdy enough, or something like that.
The photo is also slightly underexposed, as shown by the histogram.
Zoom in and look at the boulder just above the waterfall. You'll see that sharp focus was not achieved. Perhaps the tripod was bumped during the long exposure.
Hallo, darum geht es doch garnicht, wenn es das Foto schon gibt, auch wenn es schon älter ist, hast du eben Pech gehabt, du bist raus. Aber ehrlich muß ich auch sagen, ich kann jetzt das Original eben auch nicht bei 100/200/300% Ansicht beurteilen, das wird gemacht, da muß man durch. Jedes Foto wird und sollte bearbeitet werden und das kann schon zuviel sein, das Lieblingswort bei Adobe heißt: Artefakte sind zu sehen. Viel Spaß noch.
This is not the problem. I have regularly older pictures accepted in stock, even pictures that I took with my very first digital camera. It seems, however, that Adobe accepts only pictures that meat their quality standard. So, if you want to help users, you should explain, why a picture could be refused. All other entries are not targeting.
Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer