EN SERIO?

Aberración cromática y ruido? Es una imagen reflejada en un trombón, ¿cómo quieres que no tenga aberración?

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.  Read these links.  And compare your work with other Stock Inventory.  

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Model/Property Releases:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

¿De verdad no me publicáis tres fotografías sin retocar y con calidad RAW y sin nigún tipo de retoque,  porque no cumplén vuestros estádares de calidad? Cada día perdéis un poco más de credibilidad.......................

By @Glandarius

Eso es correcto, porque las imágenes que no cumplen los requisitos de calidad disgustarían a los clientes, que pedirían devoluciones y no estarían contentos. Tienes que entender que la moderación no es para hacerte mejor colaborador, sino para proteger a los clientes (¡y a Adobe!) de las fotos malas.

Rejections are never fun for any of us, and accepting that photos that we've worked really hard to take have quality issues can be a hard pill to swallow sometimes.  I wouldn't take it personally, and instead treat it as an educational opportunity to learn how to better evaluate your photos for next time.

I will also confirm these have noticeable technical flaws.  I hope you have better luck with future submissions!

There are exposure problems (highlights and shadows) in all three photos.

The first photo needs an IP release, the last photo needs model releases.

The horns have spots that need to be removed.

Your reflection is in all three photos.