Skip to main content
V
Valdeci5EB7
Participant
July 29, 2022
Answered

Excessive photos refused

  • July 29, 2022
  • 4 replies
  • 420 views

Starting some time ago, probably 3 months, the level of refused photos that I have submitted became unbelievable. Really, I do not understand the reasons and neither the refused reason is showed. Same photos I have accepted by other stock pictures. Also, this is a paradox, why so much rejections while Adobe is posting on the media advertisement asking people to upload their old pictures? Samples of rejected photos.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer RALPH_L

Both photos are underexposed and not sharp.

4 replies

jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
jacquelingphoto2017Community Expert
Community Expert
July 31, 2022

Hi @Valdeci5EB7,

The hibiscus is underexposed and too much is out of focus. There are also detail lost. Also there was a shake.

The second flowers also is underexposed and too much is out of focus. It seem to have a white balance issue also.

Have a look at the Stock Contributor Learn and Support,

The Tips to get your files accepted and some additional details that will help you submit more acceptable photos.

 

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
Community Expert
July 29, 2022

Other microstock agencies have different standards for acceptance. 

 

If you're having a lot of rejections, check your equipment. 

  • Your camera, sensor and lenses may need cleaning.
  • Check your light meter. 
  • Get additional light sources.
  • Use a stable tripod, etc... 

 

That said, Adobe has millions & millions of perfect flowers to choose from. Sales potential is low in such a fiercely competitive keyword category. 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
George_F
Community Expert
George_FCommunity Expert
Community Expert
July 29, 2022

I agree with @RALPH_L , these are underexposed and lack sharpness.  Make sure to zoom in on the details, between 100%-200% to spot the technical flaws.

 

Shooting at f1.8 and 50mm and that close to a subject would have a pretty shallow depth of field, I'm not surprised there is so little in focus.

 

Hope that helps!

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
    RALPH_L
    Community Expert
    RALPH_LCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    July 29, 2022

    Both photos are underexposed and not sharp.

      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices