Thanks for your comments, all are helpful. At the end, I understand that the pictures, in most cases, are appreciated about the technical aspects... and of course not everyone has the same point of view. Some times artistic aspects can't be measured only with the technical aspects and some times for me is more important to show something that looks just like it is in the real world. Most of the time I don't like to modify the scenarios where I capture the subjects, but it's OK, like I said, every person will judge from their own perspective or in this case, by the rules of the site.
Thanks to all for your comments, I appreciate all of them and I think there is no correct answer... and at the end, every one is giving their opinion on what is their best guest about the reasons of the rejections... so again, thanks to every one to share some of your knowledge in these cases.
Hi,
I think as experienced providers we have analyzed all aspects concerning the reasons for rejection correctly and here you can learn something for yourself concerning the microstock industry and photography in general. If you can't find an answer here then you have to acquire a lot of knowledge here.
If you mean that you photograph things somehow and they look the way they just looked to you through the viewfinder at that moment and find that natural, is your view certainly not based with photographic knowledge and skill.
I think it's pretty presumptuous to associate your beginner-level photography with any artistic aspects. And this is certainly not a question of the viewer's taste, it can be objectively assessed.
I don't think you can take big steps forward with this attitude in photography in general and certainly not in the field of stock photography either.