Participant

Answered

Generative AI content .... ????

11 replies
822 views
Translate

Unreported Generative AI content

Are you serious?

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

RALPH_LCorrect answer

Community Expert

The Moderstors do not study your exif data. I think they selected the wrong rejection reason code. It should have been rejected for quality issues due to the excessive noise in the sky.

In addition, there is a white halo around the mountain.

Naturaly, the signature is a no go.

Abambo

Community Expert

What is the relation with Fotolia?

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Ricky336

Community Expert

Do you have a question, what was the rejection reason? If an image contains watermarks it will get rejected!

Translate

maxp33664242Author

Participant

Hi, thank you for your answer;

there was no watermark in the original image that I have uploaded on my personal stock space (the pic uploaded in this post is just a low res from my personal web site, this is the reason why you see ; if you can read my previous answer, you can understand what I mean...

thanks you

Translate

maxp33664242Author

Participant

"..(the pic uploaded in this post is just a low res from my personal web site, this is the reason why you see my watermark)"...

Translate

Jill_C

Community Expert

What is your question? You are not addressing Adobe directly here. This is a community of other stock contributors.

Translate

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

maxp33664242Author

Participant

Hi, I'm sorry for my previous post;

I apologize, please forgive me;

I uploaded this picture 7 years ago on my stock contributor personal space;
this pic was refused with these possible reasons:

- Incorrect use of another artist's name.

- Generative AI content not disclosed.

Really? an image file from 2017, with exif data that show this is a my nikon file, they said me "Incorrect use of another artist's name" or "Generative AI content not disclosed" ... seriously?

How is it possible?

"another artist's name"??? "AI generated content"? in the 2017 ???

Ok, no problem...

I don't understand, but it's ok;

thanks

Translate

daniellei4510

Community Expert

I guess we're just confused. I'm not sure why one of the reasons for rejection would have been "use of another artist's name" if it didn't have the watermark, unless you mistakenly uploaded the watermarked file. That said, I certainly don't understand why this would have been construed as AI. I'd simply resubmit if the latter is the case.

Translate

Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.