Hello to everyone

Hi @Nat_9868 ,

There's this dark cut in the eyes and the model's left eye is not sharp.

For the second file, the model right eye is not sharp and the left eye has some grains or tiny ulcers.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

What was the reason for rejection?

They look very synthetic and artificial.  I'm not sure what commercial value they hold.

Are you a bot? This AI-influenced response is completely non-responsive to the question.

Many artifacts and odd details are scattered throughout the image.

Sorry, forgot to add my example.

Sometimes (or often?), AI likes to have a field day with ornamental and often random, nonsensical embellishments.  

---

@Salman23031396tc4a wrote:

Of course, I’d be happy to help analyze why an image might have been rejected and provide feedback to guide improvements. However, since I can’t view images results by Adobe Stock here, it would be helpful if you could describe key details, elements, or any feedback you may have already received about the image. Additionally, knowing the specific platform or context (e.g., stock photography, social media guidelines, or content standards) could help tailor my feedback.

Common reasons images get rejected often include:

Quality Issues: Low resolution, poor lighting, or blurriness.
Content Guidelines: Violating terms like explicit content, offensive material, or trademarked elements.
Technical Aspects: Improper file format, wrong dimensions, or color inaccuracies.
Composition: Poor framing, excessive noise, or distracting elements.
Model Releases: Missing documentation for identifiable people.
Feel free to share any details or specifics for more tailored feedback!

 

---

Nonsense answer. 

Just checking a small area of your first (cosmic4) at 100%, I see multiple issues with colour noise: 

Other issues are with texture,  artefacts, random blurs etc.

Cosmic1 has similar issues, but less colour noise: